Official Anchor Text Guide (With Proven & Tested Strategies)

If you understand how to use anchor text, then you are light-years ahead of most other SEOs.

Most beginner SEOs don’t realize it, but something as simple as anchor text can make or break your SEO campaign.

Use it correctly, and you will dominate the SERPs.

Use it recklessly, and watch your organic traffic disappear overnight.

Now that I’ve scared you, I’m going to show you exactly how to use anchor text so that you:

  • A) get amazing results from link building and,
  • B) you keep your site safe from any algorithm updates in the future.

It doesn’t matter whether you are a self-proclaimed white hat or a down-and-dirty blackhat, the strategies you are going to read straight up WORK.

Sound cool?

Then keep reading.

S1-min

What is Anchor Text?

It is simply the visible and clickable text in a link.

For example, you may be reading an article and see something like: “the SEO strategies over at Gotch SEO” – “Gotch SEO” is the anchor.

To create it, you’ll need to memorize a very simple HTML code:
Screen Shot 2014-10-02 at 8.36.35 AM

Why Does It Matter?

It will always “matter” as long as backlinks matter. Prior to the Penguin update in 2012, anchor text was one of the easiest ways for Google to understand the relevancy of any given website.

Now, it is one of the best ways for Google to penalize spam and over-optimization.

Does this mean anchor text is becoming meaningless? Not in the slightest.

I’m willing to go out on a limb and say that it’s even stronger than it was before… (when it’s used the way I’m going to show you).

Pre-Penguin Anchor Text Silliness

Before the first Penguin update, you could go absolutely buck wild with your anchor text.

You could literally use 100% exact match anchors for all of your backlinks and you would rank.

It was like stealing candy from a baby, and Google obviously had to make a change.

That change was the Penguin update.

Google Penguin 1.0: The Update That Changed It ALL

The first Penguin update in 2012 literally changed the link building game forever.

Penguin targeted any website that was blatantly doing low-quality, artificial, or spammy link building in an effort to “game” the search engine.

How did they determine if a website is building links artificially or using spam to rank?

Simple.

ANCHOR TEXT.

Why, might you ask?

Because a normal website should not have 100% of its backlinks with the anchor text “Pay Day Loans”.

You really need to understand how Penguin analyzes anchor text and how it determines whether a site should be penalized or not.

I promise you, it’s not complicated, but it is CRITICAL that you understand so your site doesn’t get penalized.

Here’s exactly how Penguin works:

  1. You build a backlink
  2. Google indexes the backlink
  3. Google places this new backlink into its database for your specific website, also known as your “link profile”
  4. Steps 1-3 are repeated over-and-over, and now you have a “link profile” that the algorithm can analyze

Now, this is where the real magic happens:
The algorithm analyzes your link profile and compares it to your on-site keyword optimization.

If your on-page content is optimized for “PayDay Loans” and 100% of your anchors are “PayDay Loans”, then you will get a penalty.

That’s because it’s very easy for Google’s algorithm to see that you are:
A) trying to rank for “PayDay Loans”
B) you are building links artificially

Exact match anchor text + keyword-rich optimization = Penguin penalty

So, how do you avoid getting penalized?

You need to understand HOW and WHEN to use your keyword-rich anchors.

You will be learning about this in the following sections.

S2-min

Different Types of Anchor Text

In order to create a “natural” anchor text profile, you need to understand all the different types of anchors.

Branded Anchors

“Branded” anchors are any anchor that uses your brand name in it.

Sentence sample: “Over at GOTCH SEO you can learn search engine optimization.”

Branded anchors are the safest type of anchor text if you have a branded domain. If you have an exact match domain, they aren’t too safe. I will explain this more in a later section.

To see the power of “branded” anchors, simply look at any big brands link profile.

Here are some examples for you:

 

1. Best Buy

Best Buy Anchors

2. Nordstrom

Nordstrom

3. WebMD

web md

Generic Anchors

“Generic” anchors are typically calls-to-action (CTAs) like:

  • “click here”
  • “go here”
  • “check this site out”

In a sentence: “Go here if you are looking for SEO information.” – “Go here” is the generic anchor text.

Naked Link Anchors

Any anchor that use a raw URL is considered a “naked” link.

Examples:

  • http://www.gotchseo.com/
  • http://www.gotchseo.com
  • www.gotchseo.com/
  • www.gotchseo.com
  • gotchseo.com/
  • gotchseo.com

No Anchor Trick

This is a tricky little strategy I see big brands doing.

Whether purposefully or not, it’s a good idea.

Go back to the previous images under “branded anchors”.

You will see that these brands have “noText” anchors.

What’s a better way to diversify your anchor profile, then not having ANY words at all?

The easiest way to building “noText” anchors is through images or you can simply “forget” to include an anchor within an article, which will have a similar effect.

Image Anchors

You always throw in image links with every campaign because it’s a great way to diversify your profile.

Google uses the “ALT” tag as the anchor text in an image.

If you leave this blank, you will get a “noText” anchor like I mentioned above.

Brand + Keyword Anchor

This is another great way to stay “safe” and for building a diverse, natural anchor profile.

I’ll use “Gotch SEO” as the brand and my target keyword as “link building”.

The anchor text would look like this:

  • “link building strategies by Gotch SEO”
  • “Gotch SEO link building strategies”

You are simply combining your target keyword with your brand.

LSI Anchors

“LSI” is the acronym for “Latent Semantic Indexing”.

It really just means variations of your main keyword.

So, if I’m targeting “link building”, then some LSI keywords would be:

  • “what is link building”
  • “building links”
  • “link building example”
  • “define link building”

Finding LSI keywords is super easy.

You can either use Google’s suggest options in the search bar, “Searched related to ___” at the bottom of the search results:

Related Searches Options:

Find LSI #1

Google Suggest Options:

google suggest

Google Keyword Planner:

Find LSI #3

Find LSI #4

Partial-Match Anchors

Partial matches are very similar to LSI’s. The big difference is that you are creating the anchor text variation instead of using a tool.

Here are some examples for target keyword “link building”:

  • “learn about link building”
  • “quality link building guide”
  • “this link building article”

I use partial-match anchors often because it’s a very natural way of linking to another website.

Long Anchors

Long anchors are really just an extension of partial-match except they are a little longer.

Here are a few examples for “anchor text”:

  • “anchor text is the key to link building”
  • “I used anchor text to get these rankings”

Exact Match Anchors

Exact match anchors are the king of all anchor text.

They have the power to increase your rankings, but also have the power to land you a penalty.

An exact match anchor is the exact match of whatever your target keyword is for the target page.

Example: if “link building” is my target keyword, then my exact match anchor would be “link building”.

Co-Occurrence: Build Relevancy Without Exact Match Anchors

Before I jump into percentages, you need to have a firm understanding of co-occurrence.

Don’t feel intimidated by this nerdy terminology. It’s actually really simple.

Since you won’t be using a ton of keyword-rich anchor text, you will need a way to create relevancy for your links.

Remember:

Relevancy is king in link building.

To get the “co-occurrence” effect, you are going to place your target keyword somewhere around your anchor text.

It’s best to place your target keyword as close to the anchor as possible.

It doesn’t HAVE TO be, but it is ideal.

Always value doing what’s natural over doing what could be deemed as “spammy” or “manipulative”.

Sample #1: Generic Anchor

Target Keyword: “anchor text”
Anchor Text: “go here”

“If you are looking for more information about anchor text go here right away.”

Sample #2: Branded Anchor

Target Keyword: “anchor text”
Anchor Text: “Gotch SEO”

“Anchor text is the visible and clickable text in a link. For more in-depth information you should read this article from Gotch SEO.”

Sample #3: Naked Link

Target Keyword: “anchor text”
Anchor Text: “http://www.gotchseo.com/anchor-text/”

“For more in-depth information about anchor text I highly recommend this article: http://www.gotchseo.com/anchor-text/.”

Place Your Anchor Text in Super Relevant Content

Below, I’ve given you a few different examples of the types of content I would use for link building purposes. The better the relevancy of your article to your target keyword, the higher you will rank.

Keyword: “anchor text”

Instead of writing a broader article about link building, you would actually write articles specifically about anchor text. The tighter the relevancy of the linking article, the stronger your link.

Keyword: “New York personal injury lawyer”

You would write an article like “How to Find a Reputable Personal Injury Lawyer in New York” instead of a generic article about personal injury.

Keyword: “garcinia cambogia”

Instead of writing an article about health or weight loss, you would write an article like “10 Garcinia Cambogia Scams to Watch Out For”.

Last Word on Co-Occurrence

Surround your links with highly relevant content to increase their power.

Google is fully capable of understanding the relevancy of a link without you needing to shove hundreds of exact match anchors in its face.

Now it’s time to learn the exact anchor text percentages you need to use to drive results and keep your site safe from penalties.

S3-min

Anchor Text Percentages

Now that you have a firm understanding of all the different anchor text you can use, I’m going to show you the anchor text percentages that will keep your websites safe through every Penguin update.

Keep in mind:

These percentages are what work for me.

Always test your own techniques and play with the percentages.

Branded Anchor Text: 70%

Google wants you to create a brand.

Not a fly-by-night operation.

One of the easiest ways for them to differentiate between a “brand” and a spam website is to look at the amount of branded anchors hitting the site.

In the next section, I’m going to show you the best platforms for getting quality branded links.

Naked Links: 20%

As I mentioned above, naked links are a very safe and a very natural anchor text. A bulk of your backlinks should be using naked links.

Generic Anchors: 5%

Generic anchors keep your link profile looking “natural” and are a necessity. Try not to use “click here” for every single one. You can pretty much use any word in the English language that isn’t related to your keyword, and it will be considered generic.

LSI, Partial Match Anchors: 1-5%

Okay, so after branded, naked, and generic anchors, you are left with around 5% leeway for keyword-rich anchors.

The majority of the last 5% anchors should be variations of your main keyword.

Exact Match Anchors: Less Than 1%

I use exact match anchor text as a LAST resort, not a first option.

Keep one important fact in mind:

The less exact match anchor text you use, the more powerful it becomes.

Also remember that assigning a distribution percentage to exact match anchor text is a very, very, VERY dangerous idea!

I want you to think about this for a second:

Let’s say we take the 5% exact match anchor text ratio that some SEOs recommend and do a little math:

Website A: 100 backlinks = 5 exact match anchors
This is definitely possible and generally would not put your site at risk.

Website B: 1,000 backlinks = 50 exact match anchors
The possibility of 50 different websites linking to your page with the same exact anchor text is pretty unlikely.

Website C: 10,000 backlinks = 500 exact match anchors
Obviously this isn’t possible and your page or website would get drilled by Penguin.

Now do you see why assigning a percentage to exact match anchors is a bad idea?

There is some good news for you:

The technique I’m about to show you is WAY more effective then drilling your site with exact match anchors.

Let me introduce you to anchor text cycling.

Anchor Text Cycling: More Rankings With Less Backlinks

Anchor Cycling

Anchor text cycling works like this:

Step 1: hit your target page with an exact match anchor

Step 2: hit your site with unoptimized anchor text variations

Step 3: track your rankings and watch the progress

Step 4: hit your site with another exact match anchor (if necessary)

If you follow this process correctly and your content is strong, then you likely won’t need many exact match anchors.

The point of anchor text cycling is to spread your exact match anchors out over the course of months.

This is much more natural.

Here’s a scenario:

Let’s say you have a brand new website with a fresh link profile (fresh = no backlinks built).

The first thing you would do is hit the target page with a strong, relevant link with an exact match anchor.

You might be wondering: “isn’t it dangerous to hit a brand new website with an exact match anchor?”

Negative.

No one in history has ever been penalized for one link. You can quote me on that.

Sites get penalized for their overall link profiles, not one or two links.

It’s like saying eating McDonalds one time is the reason why someone is overweight.

We know that it’s the combined effect of a bad diet over a period of time that leads to obesity.

The same goes for your link profile!

Repeatedly building over-optimized, spammy backlinks overtime will lead to a penalty.

Now that I got the weird analogy out of the way…

Why do I use an exact match anchor for my first backlink?

A) I want to see how the site reacts

B) I want to establish what my site or the target page is about right away

Don’t forget!:

It doesn’t take a ton of backlinks to rank for most keywords.

Always focus on quality over quantity when it comes to link acquisition.

The smarter you are with anchor text, the less links you will need to rank.

After I hit the site with an exact match anchor, then I begin the process of cycling.

In the excel file, there will be a few examples of how to I would cycling through anchors with a branded site, an EMD, and partial match website.

The entire point of using anchor cycling is to build a diverse and natural link profile.

Do you want to know the secret to a having a “natural” anchor profile?

The answer:

Be completely random and avoid patterns.

Take a look at these two examples:
cycling

* Site #1 is the typical link profile you will see with someone using automated link building tools or someone who has no idea what they’re doing. Google’s algorithm can easily conclude that this site is building links artificially. A manual reviewer wouldn’t even be necessary.

* Site #2 has a natural and diverse anchor profile. It will outrank site #1 with less backlinks and less keyword-rich anchor text, and it will survive all Penguin updates (as long as the links are relevant, and high-quality).

It doesn’t matter whether you are doing black, grey, or white hat SEO, this concept still applies to you.

Now that you understand how to cycle your anchors, let me show you WHERE to place your anchors.

Laser Targeted Anchor Text Placement

If you understand what I’m about to show you, you will be 99.9% safe from any Google updates.

Understanding WHERE to place your anchor text is absolutely critical to the success of your link building campaign.

Many SEOs immediately stop using a link building platform once it’s been devalued by Google.

This is the wrong approach.

The only reason why certain platforms such as article directories, web directories, and press releases have been “devalued” is because of people using commercial anchor text trying to “game” the search engine.

Many of these “devalued” properties are still very good sources for sending authority and trust to your website as long as you use the right anchor text.

Below, I’m going to show you every type of backlink along with what anchor text you should use.

“Power” Backlinks

“Power” links are any links that can have a big impact on your keyword rankings. These are the link types where you should concentrate your keyword-rich anchor text.

Editorial Links

An editorial backlink is a link placed in content “naturally” on a relevant website. These links take lots of time to acquire and sometimes require investment. Do not put your time and money to waste by using an unoptimized anchor! Editorial links are your opportunity to use an exact match or partial match anchor.

Niche Relevant Guest Posts

Sites that allow guest posts will typically let you leave a backlink in the author bio box. You should use unoptimized anchors for author bios because Google has cracked down on guest posts. If the site allows you to link within the body of the content, then make sure you drop a keyword-rich anchor.

Resource Pages

Quality resource page will either allow branded anchors or the title of the resource. If you are linking to a content resource on your site, you should use the title of the page.

For example, if this article you are reading as placed on an “SEO resources” page, I would use “Official Anchor Text Guide (With Proven & Tested Strategies)” as the anchor text.

This is considered a partial match anchor.

Private Blog Networks (PBNs)

I don’t mess around with PBNs too much anymore, but you should use exact and partial match anchors. You invested money to buy the expired domain, so you should try to get the most out of it.

301 Redirects

If you are a beginner, then I do not recommend messing with 301s quite yet. As you may or may not know, 301 redirects are basically like stealing rankings in Google. In a flash, your site can transform from a weak new website, to an authoritative one overnight.

If you didn’t know, a 301 redirect is a permanent redirect of a website. With a 301, a large majority (not all) of the authority is transferred to the new domain.

So, why am I telling you this? Because one thing that many people do not take into account, is that the 301 will also transfer the anchor text from the redirected domain.

This means, if the redirected domain has a spammy anchor profile, it WILL transfer to your new website. It also means, if the redirected domain was penalized for over-optimized anchor text, there is a good chance that it will transfer to the new website.

There are some ways to avoid this.

Option #1: make sure the new website has a good amount of unoptimized anchor text BEFORE you hit the site with the 301 redirect.

Option #2: build unoptimized anchors to the domain that will be redirected if the anchors are too aggressive.

I recommend combining both options to make sure your new site stays safe.

Foundational Links

“Foundational” links are backlinks designs to “dilute” your anchor text profile and increase your site’s trust.

That means you should not use ANY keyword-rich anchors for the following link types:

  • Paid Directories
  • Traditional Directories
  • Business Citations
  • Press Releases
  • Niche Relevant Blog Comments
  • Branded Web 2.0s
  • Forum Signatures
  • Sidebar/Footer Links
  • Profile Links
  • Social Bookmarks
  • Donations/Sponsorships

The only anchor text that should ever be used on foundational links are naked, branded, and generic anchor text.

Tier Two and Three Anchor Text

Figuring out anchor text on tier one is hard enough, but what about tier two and three?

Fortunately, the percentages aren’t as strict.

Before I explain, you need to know what “tiered” links are:

  • Tier One = the backlinks directly hitting your website
  • Tier Two = the backlinks directly hitting your tier one
  • Tier Three = the backlinks directly hitting your tier two

Tier Three -> Tier Two -> Tier One -> Your Website

Since these links aren’t hitting your site directly, you can be a little more aggressive, but don’t go too crazy.

Here’s how your tier two anchor ratios should typically look:

  • Naked links: 40%
  • Generic: 30%
  • LSI, Partial-Match: 25%
  • Exact Match: 5%

To see what backlinks are best for tier two read this guide.

Just like your tier one, you are using your keyword-based anchors only with your most powerful links and saving the foundational links for diversity.

I typically don’t build a tier three, but if you decide to, you can go pretty crazy with anchor text.

When I do use tier three, here’s how I do it:

  • Naked links: 10%
  • Generic: 10%
  • LSI, Partial-Match: 50%
  • Exact Match: 30%

S4-min

EMDs, PMDs: Avoid Like the Plague (If You Are a Beginner)

First, let’s make sure we understand what “EMD” and “PMD” actually mean.

Exact Match Domain (EMD): a domain that is an exact match of your target keyword.

Example: if my target keyword is “anchor text”, then my exact match domain would be “anchortext.com”, “anchortext.net”, etc.

Partial Match Domain (PMD): a domain with part of the keyword or a domain with the keyword, but also with filler words.

Example: if my target keyword is “anchor text”, then two different PMDs could be “anchortextbible.com” or “theanchorbible.com”.

Why should you avoid these types of domains if you are an SEO / link building beginner?

Answer: EMDs are very susceptible to over-optimization penalties.

PMDs aren’t as dangerous, but in inexperienced hands, could trigger a penalty.

Now the real question:

Are EMDs or PMDs even worth it?

Most SEOs who follow the Google propaganda would say they are “dead”. This is mainly because of the EMD update in September 2012.

Those SEOs are partially right.

LOW-QUALITY exact match domains with thin content, low-quality links, and over-optimized anchor text are definitely dead.

All the percentages I’ve shown earlier in this guide, are suited for branded domains.

For EMDs the percentages will be slightly different.

Ratios for Exact Match Domains:

  • Naked Links: 70%
  • Generic: 20%
  • LSI: 5%
  • Partial Match: 1-5%
  • Branded / Exact Match Anchors: 1-5%

Over-Optimized Anchor Text Recovery

If you have been hit by an algorithmic penalty, then it IS possible to get your rankings back if anchor text is the problem.

In my experience, over-optimized anchor text mixed with over-optimized on-page SEO, is the perfect formula for getting your website hit by Penguin.

There is a lot of evidence that both Google Panda and Penguin work together when analyzing a website.

Both algorithms analyze different factors, collect and pool data, recognize spammy patterns, and then penalize a site.

Example:

updates working together

The good news is that both of these problems are pretty easy to fix.

Although this guide is dedicated to anchor text, I will explain some quick on-site SEO tips that will help you recover from a penalty.

On-Page Changes for Penalty Recovery

Keyword Density

Typically the biggest issue stems from keyword density.

YES, keyword density DOES matter.

Stuffing a page with the same keyword over-and-over will set you up for a penalty.

Go back to the section “How Penguin Works” to understand why this happens.

Obviously, the first plan of action is for you to fix your keyword density.

If you want to rank a particular page, you don’t need to go crazy with stuffing keywords.

Place your target keyword in these critical spots on your page:

  • Title
  • First sentence
  • ALT tag of first image
  • First H1 or H2 tag (you can use a variation of the keyword here)
  • Last sentence

Assuming your article is longer than 600 words, your density will probably be 1% or less.

This is ideal.

You can go as high as 3%, but I don’t recommend higher if you are looking for long-term rankings.

If you are having trouble keeping your percentages low, then you need to use variations main keyword.

Not only will this keep you safe, but actually help your page rank for variations of your keyword.

Keyword Dilution

Many people don’t take this one into account, but it can really hurt your rankings.

Keyword “dilution” is when you are trying to rank more than one page for the same or very closely related keywords.

For example, if my homepage was targeting “Los Angeles Personal Injury Law Firm”, and I had a subpage targeting “LA Personal Injury Law Lawyer”, Google would then choose which page it thinks is most relevant to the searchers.

At the same time, whatever page it chooses will decrease in value because it’s a spammy on-page tactic whether it’s on purpose or not.

Keyword dilution confuses Google because it won’t know what page to prioritize.

A confused Google = no search engines visibility

This problem can be solved very easily:

  1. Target only ONE page for your keywords: after the Hummingbird update, Google is very good at ranking pages for many variations of the same keyword. If you are target “Los Angeles personal injury lawyer” and you use the anchor text strategies in this book, your page will rank for all variations of that keyword such as “LA personal injury attorney”, “personal injury lawyer in Los Angeles”, etc.
  2. If you decide to keep an inner page for targeting your keyword, then change the META information on the duplicate page to avoid keyword dilution. If you are going to use the homepage to target your main keyword, then 301 redirect the other landing page to the homepage.

Backlink Strategies for Penalty Recovery

There are a few different link building techniques you can use to recovery from a penalty.

Depending on the severity of the penalty, these tricks will work on the majority of penalized domains.

Keep in mind, my personal approach to penalties is to just start over with a fresh domain.

But if you are in love with your current site, the strategies below will help.

Should You Disavow?

I wanted to clear air before I explain the strategies:

Disavowing is an absolute LAST resort, not the first.

The only time when you really need to use this tool is if your website was hit with negative SEO or it’s impossible to remove some of the links that you previously built.

You can recover from ALL algorithmic penalties without ever needing to use this tool. If you have a manual penalty, then it may be necessary (I’ll be addressing manual penalties after this section).

Remove Links With Commercial Anchor Text (From Spammy Sites)

As I discussed in the section about anchor text placement, you should only use commercial / keyword-rich anchor text on “power” link sources.

Please read How to Build Tier One Backlinks to see what types of links should be directly hitting your website.

If you made the unfortunate mistake of building backlinks on low-quality sources with keyword-rich anchors, then you have two options:

  1. Go back and delete the links.
  2. If you can’t delete the links, then disavow.

After you’ve done all you can do to remove keyword-rich anchors from spammy sources, then it’s time to jump into anchor text dilution.

Please notice that I said “spammy” sources.

Don’t go on a link deleting spree because you will end up deleting links that are actually helping you.

Anchor Text Diluting

This is the most common technique and it does work in many cases.

All you are going to do is build unoptimized backlinks to your website with nothing but branded, generic, and naked link anchors.

Absolutely no keyword rich anchors!

Use the “foundational” links I explained in the previous section to dilute your anchor text profile.

Before Penguin 3.0, you could counter over-optimized anchors by using the dilution technique.

Diluting still works, but there are some added factors now.

We have noticed, like the Micro Site Masters, that one important element of the penalties is a lack of GOOD links.

If you combine a low-quality link profile with lots of keyword-rich anchor text, then you are asking to be hit.

These are the links you should use in to create a better anchor profile (in priority order):

1.) Strong, Relevant Backlinks

These are the most costly, but are also the best for improving your overall link profile. Get as many as you can. Relevancy is king with or without a penalty. If you don’t want to put in the effort to get these links, then I recommend you check out our new service.

2.) Business Directories / Local Citations

Take the time to create business listings because it’s a perfect way to send quality link unoptimized anchors to your site. This is an extremely time consuming process, so I recommend you use a service like Whitespark to avoid wasting your precious time.

3.) LEGIT Social Profiles

Go out and build REAL social profiles for your website. Populate the profiles with your information, content, etc.

Only use the best sites: Twitter, Facebook, Google +, Tumblr, etc.

These sites will give you a nice mix of NoFollow and DoFollow unoptimized anchors and will build trust for your website.

4.) High-Quality Press Release Distribution

Create a quality press release and distribute it through a quality channel. Press releases are great for quickly getting unoptimized anchors from many different IPs. You will also build diversity in your link profile because of the NoFollow / DoFollow mix.

301 Penalty Recovery Trick

Remember in an earlier section when I said that anchor text travels through a 301 to the new website?

You are going to use this to your advantage to recovery from an algorithmic penalty.

There are two variations of the 301 penalty recovery trick.

Variation #1
Expired Domain -> Penalized Domain

For the first variation, you will need to find a quality expired domain through a service like Freshdrop. Make sure the anchor profile is clean and has very little keyword rich anchors.

Look for a domain with branded, generic, and naked link anchors or what some people may refer to as a “natural” anchor profile.

Although you are not necessary using this expired domain for ranking purposes, it’s not a bad idea to find one with solid metrics.

Preferably PA 30 +, DA 20 +, PR 2 +, and a Trust Flow of 10 +.

Also, if you can find a domain that is relevant to yours, it will work even better.

All that you are going to do now is 301 redirect the expired domain to your penalized site and track the results.

Variation #2
Links -> Penalized Site -> New Website

For variation two, you are going to start fresh with a new website, but you are going to piggy back off the authority of your penalized domain (hopefully it has some).

Step 1: buy a new BRANDED website (avoid EMD, PMD)

Step 2: build high-quality branded backlinks to your new website
Use business directories, quality paid directories, niche relevant blogs comments, press releases, etc. Only use branded anchor text.

Step 3: build unoptimized backlinks to your penalized domain
The goal is to decrease the percentage of keyword rich anchors. The percentage all depends on the severity your particular situation. If you have 70% keyword rich anchor text, then you will need to get that down to at least 30% or less. If you have 30% keyword rich anchors, then you will want to get it down to 10% or less.

Step 4: check your anchor profile with Ahrefs, Majestic, or Open Site Explorer.

Step 5: if you have cut your keyword rich anchors in half, then it’s time to redirect your penalized site to the new domain.

This works because A) you are using a new branded website with an established branded text anchor profile, B) you have improved the anchor profile of the penalized website, and C) you have transferred authority to a new domain.

What About Manual Penalties?

It’s less headache and much more cost-effective to just start a new website, then to try to get out of a manual penalty.

Like I always tell my clients, getting a manual penalty is like going to prison for a felony.

Although you may get out of prison one day, you are still always going to have the felony on your record.

Do you really think Google wipes the slate clean for a website that was previously given a manual penalty?

Even if you do get the penalty lifted, ranking your site will never be easy and it’s always going to feel like “something is holding you back”.

Changing Anchor Text: Red Flag?

I’ve heard this question a lot and I’ve actually done this many times.

The answer is: sometimes.

I know it’s an annoying answer.

If you want to raise a red flag, then change a non-keyword rich anchor to a keyword rich anchor.  Google may or not devalue a link when this happens, but it’s definitely not worth it.

Just leave the link how it is, and go acquire a link somewhere else.

Situations that won’t throw up a red flag:

1. Changing a keyword rich anchor to a non-optimized anchor – going back and decreasing your amount of commercial anchor text can often increase your rankings. If your exact match anchors or keyword-rich anchors are above 25%, then you may want to consider unoptimizing some of those.

2. Deleting an anchor and placing it within a different part of the article – if you decide to change an anchor, you should always place the new one in a different part of the article. When you do this, it makes the anchor / link “new” in Google’s eyes.

You will be losing an aged link, but in theory, starting with a fresh link.

IMPORTANT: You should only change anchor text under extreme circumstances.

Most over-optimized anchor text issues can be solved with the techniques I listed in the penalty recovery section.

Number of Links + Brand Searches = ?

Although this has more to do with links in general, it’s still important to note. If you have a certain amount of links, then you should be getting a certain amount of branded searches. It’s hard to give a definitive number or ratio of brand searches to links, but Google is actively implementing this into the algorithm and it will be a strong ranking factor once it’s refined.

For example, if Gotch SEO has 1,000 backlinks, then hypothetically, 1,000 websites have found my content or site to be useful.

For this reason, my website will have buzz and people should be searching to learn more about my brand in Google or to revisit my website.

I should be getting searches like “Gotch SEO”, “Nathan Gotch”, “who is Nathan Gotch”, etc.

branded

This is exactly what you want.

Now, there are two ways to get more people searching for your brand.

  • #1: create highly valuable content that people share and link to naturally
  • #2: create highly valuable content, rank it well in Google, THEN people will share it naturally (if it’s good).

Option #1 is the hoping and praying approach, while #2 is the action taking approach.

As you will notice, creating valuable content is a must for both.

Don’t get obsessed with rankings, and forget that you are actually suppose to provide the searchers some sort of value.

If you don’t, then you won’t make money from your website or business, and you just wasted however many months trying to rank in Google for no apparent reason.

Focus on Option #2, and you will get the branded searches you need to keep your site looking natural in the eyes of Google.

Anchor Text Tracking: Don’t Shoot Blindly at the Target

Tracking your anchor text is absolutely critical if you are building backlinks. If you aren’t, you are basically shooting at a target blindfolded.

There needs to be organization and you need to make sure you are not overdoing it with keyword-rich anchors.

I use a good ol’ excel sheet to track my anchors.

In the excel sheet, I typically only track the keyword-rich anchors and keep mental note of the branded links I’ve built thus far.

Conclusion

That’s all I think can of on anchor text and I know these strategies will help you achieve some awesome rankings while keeping your site from any future Penguin updates.

If you enjoyed this article, then you better share it with your friends!

Okay, thanks for reading and leave your questions below to keep the conversion going.

– Gotch

Comments

  1. Good stuff as always!!

    Here is a good question. Those directory links, where do you point them? Only at the home page or at deeper pages? Not everyone wants to only rank their home page for any given key word.

    Cheers!

  2. Great post Nathan!

    I already do a lot of what you have mentioned but the keyword next to the URL is one i’m going to try

    Cheers,
    Mark

    • That’s great man, keep up the good work!

      • Hi Nathan,

        I Really Enjoying Your Blog Post , Your Blog Post are Really Very Helpful For Me.

        But I Have a Question , Sorry For off Topic.

        Actually I Have a Website and The Website Was Ranking on Their Keywords 2nd and 3rd Page of Google Before One Month.

        Now The Website Lost Ranking and It Showing on 17th Page of Google.Then I Redirect That Domain to Another Domain by 301 Redirect. After Redirecting Some of Keywords Get Their Ranking Back.

        Now My Question is , Making New Backlinks to My Old Domain Can Increase Searching Ranking of My New Redirected Domain OR Should I Make New Links to My New Redirected Domain.

        I Hope You Will Give Me Right Answer. I am Waiting For Your Important Reply.
        Thanks!!!!!

        • Hi Verma, sorry to hear about your loss in rankings and thanks for the comment. It really depends if you were penalized for anchor text over-optimization or if you were hit by Panda. I need more details to be able to help you out my friend. Thanks!

        • Hi Verma, sorry to hear about your loss in rankings and thanks for the comment. It really depends if you were penalized for anchor text over-optimization or if you were hit by Panda. I need more details to be able to help you out my friend. Thanks!

  3. Wow! Wonderful. Finally I got the piece I have been looking since penguin update out. I always concerned about anchor texts, for my website that has been slapped by Google on updates.
    Now I think I can do better with info you provided.

    Thanks Gotch,

  4. I was really confuse about this. Thank you for making it clear. But only 5% exact match? Is it not little bit short? Waiting for your answer. I want to discuss about few matter’s about my site. Would you like to give me your skype or personal mail that I can contact with you.

    • Thanks for the comment! Anywhere around 5% is usually all it takes as long as they placed on the right properties. Keep in mind, you’re still using variations of your keyword as well. So in reality, you’re using your keyword about 15% of the time.

  5. hey Nathan

    That’s very insightful.

    And how do you diversify your home page vs. inner page linking, like 50%-50%, or 30% – 70%?

    • Thanks for the comment John. Honestly, I don’t really think about my percentages when linking to my homepage or internal pages because I just do whatever it takes to rank. And also, I only target 1-3 keywords per page on my website. So, my percentages are always super diversified (even though that’s not the intention). I use the 1-3 keyword method because it makes my pages super targeted and easier to rank. If you’re only targeting your homepage with keywords, then you’ll probably want to use at least a 50/50 split.

      – Gotch

  6. Great post I will be using this as a reference to avoid bad anchor diversification.

    Nathan this post got me a bit concerned actually, I create small product review type sites in conjunction with some bigger sites just to earn a little more cash.

    The competition for some of these small review sites is so low I have been ranking them simply using one exact match anchor from a pr1 directory. Simply to give it a little nudge and index it faster.

    However, paid directories seem risky, the link leaves the page within a few days and becomes a useless pr 0 exact anchor directory link that I now have no control over. One of these sites dive bombed and I have no control too see if its the directory to blame or not.

    For future references, for a site I only need one pr 1 exact match anchor to rank, what type of link would you build for that first and only link? And would you make it an exact match anchor or naked url? I feel these sites arent worth using a PR blog link as a simple 2$ directory has been working. Which is why I asked.

    Anyway thanks for article and hopefully response :)

    • Craig,

      Thanks for the comment. I would never use an exact match anchor for any directory link because Google watches them like a hawk because they were heavily spammed in the past. But, it’s pretty unlikely that your website tanked because of one exact match anchor.

      If I could choose one link to rank a site, I go with a high PR / high domain authority link and I would use an exact match anchor.

      Side note: paid directories are actually great for sending trust to your website as long as you use a branded anchor.

      Let me know if you have any other questions!

      – Gotch

      • I have used a similar strategy of a paid directory, it indexes sites fast and you get the pr3 recent boost before the directory drops you off their front page into archives.

        I actually checked a site I used one on and noticed something disturbing.

        Since directories have search boxes, my site listing was coming up on various random searches and I was recieving a link from every results page I was found on.

        In this case the one directory link was giving me 20 referring pages from the same anchor.

        My site was an EMD so now I noticed I have 88% of my anchors are the exact match anchor. The site is small and ranking fine but I fear its sustainability now.

        Just wondering if this is bad Nathan? and if these count as real backlinks since there coming from the same listing via search pages.

        • Hi Jack, thanks for the comment. Yeah this problem tends to happen with directories. All you need to do is build more links to dilute the anchors, and you’ll be in the clear. EMD’s can be tricky, so make sure you’re tracking the anchor text of every single link you build.

          * EMD tip: whenever I work with EMDs, the first thing I do is build a ton of generic anchors and naked links before using any optimized anchors. That’s what I did in my authority site project because I’m using an EMD for it.

          – Gotch

      • Hey Nathan thanks for the help.

        I have sent a PR link to a new test site to see if the results will be similar as the directory were. So far they are not, at least in terms of ranking speed, but I will wait and see.

        If in the future in conjunction to a PR link I want to also send a paid directory link to an EMD site to get the fast rankings/trust as I did before, Instead of an Exact anchor and having to be in damage control after, what anchor can I use to get the same effect without the risks?

        Since branded isnt possible for an EMD should I go URL or some other?

        Thanks

        • Hi Craig,

          Was the PR link contextual, if so, is the article indexed? As far as which anchor to use, the best is always exact match, but it’s dangerous when using directories. Personally, I stick to branded anchors for directories. If it’s an EMD, you’ll probably be fine using the title (your brand). Just make sure you send some other unoptimized, generic anchors to your website just to be safe.

          – Gotch

  7. Hi Nathan thanks for sharing, I wonder if you can please help me out with one or two queries as this is exactly what I have been researching this morning?

    For inner pages on a website, what kind of anchor text do you use and is it safe to use your brand name for inner pages?

    Im still trying to repair our link profile post penguin and so far have got the link anchor text down to 29% by diluting it and building more brand name/author/naked url links etc, what would you do to deduce that?

    • Thomas,

      thanks for the comment! I sent you an email regarding the queries.

      Building branded links to inner pages is totally fine and I actually encourage it. I do it all the time to dilute anchor text.

      You’re getting super close to getting it down where it needs to be. One trick to get it down quickly is to find a quality website in your niche and get a sitewide link with your brand as the anchor.

      If this is hard to obtain, I would use a high-quality press release service – reason being that you can use about three branded anchors in the article and it will be distributed to tons of websites. This is a more expensive option, but it’s definitely the best.

      If you’re looking for a more affordable option, I would go with dofollow blog comments, social bookmarks, and directory links. All using naked/URL, branded, and generic links. Let me know if you need any of these types of services.

      – Gotch

      • Geoff McCabe says:

        Thanks for the useful article and response to this question, but it doesn’t quite answer for me one very important question. What anchor text and in what quanitities can be used for inner pages? Should you stick with mostly “brand” anchor text even for inner pages, or is it okay to have a majority of keyword anchor texts for inner pages? For example, if your website is cattoys.com and you have an inner page “cattoys.com/furrymouse” then we may expect that 50-90% of the anchor texts going to that inner page would be “furry mouse” and not “cattoys.com”. Obviously the point is to avoid Penguin penalties for over-optimized anchor text. I have looked all over the internet for an answer to this question, but haven’t found any advice at all about this. Thanks for your input on this.

        • Hi Geoff, the percentages are the same regardless of whether it’s your homepage or an inner page. Exact match anchors and keyword variations should always be low, and branded, URL, and generic anchors should be high no matter what page you’re building links to. If you take this approach, you’ll not only be safe from penalties, but you’ll also give more weight to your exact match anchor text.

          Let me know if you have any more questions or clarifications. Thanks!

          – Gotch

          • Geoff McCabe says:

            This doesn’t make sense to me because it doesn’t match with organic linking habits. For example, my website is something like superresort.com which is a yoga center. I don’t think anyone has ever brand linked to my inner pages about yoga retreats or yoga teacher training. They brand-link the index page, or they use an anchor text such as “yoga retreats” or “yoga retreats at Super Resort” when linking to an inner page of mine such as “superresort.com/yoga-retreats” about those subjects. With Penguin, we are told to keep money keyword anchor text to 5% or so. If that was true for inner pages, then nearly every website would get penguin-penalized for the organic links that tend to use keywords as anchor text. I ask this because I have a manual penguin penalty, directed at keywords such as “yoga” and “retreats” which aren’t in my brand name. So, does Google expect me to go and remove/disavow all the good links I have to my inner pages when they are 100% natural organic links, in order to get the Penguin penalty lifted?

          • Pounding the same page with countless exact match anchors is way more unnatural than building branded, generic, and naked link anchors. Natural “organic link habits” don’t have patterns to their anchor text. Penguin CAN and DOES target inner pages for over-optimized anchor text that’s why the percentages stay true no matter what page you’re building links to.

            Do you have a manual penalty or an algorithmic Penguin penalty? Those are two entirely different things.

            Yes, that’s the route GOOGLE wants you to take. Personally, it’s a dead end street. If you’ve been hit with a penalty, you’re always going to have that history and ranking that site is always going to be difficult.

            Unless you’re really in love with this site, your time is better off building a completely new BRANDED website and focusing on the right linking and anchor text strategies right off the bat (so you don’t get penalized).

            Let me know if you have more questions Geoff and thanks for the comment!

            – Gotch

          • Hi Nathan,

            I though you said in another article always use your Exact Match anchor text for internal linking as over-optimisation only counts for external links?

            What anchor text’s do I use to link page 1 in silo 1 to page 2, to page 3, to page 4 to homepage?

            Thanks!

          • Hi Fisher, I did say that and it’s still true, but its risk mitigation. It’s not a bad idea to diversify internal anchors. You just don’t need to track them like you would your external links.

  8. Hi Nathan,

    Very helpful article, thanks for writing it.
    The last commenters question was the question I wanted
    to ask.

    Part 2 of that question, when linking to an inner page
    using the url as the anchor,

    do you include the filename as well as part of the
    anchor text

    thanks

  9. Hi Nathan,

    Many people add content to article directories, web 2.0 sites,
    and create youtube videos.

    Are there anchor text rules when trying to rank these 3 types of web properties.

    This is something I’m going to start working on more.

    thanks

  10. Great post, this is now my go to reference for anchor text diversification ratios.

    Nathan, this article made me remember something I was uncertain of and you seem like a perfect person to ask.

    I have a page which the primary keyword is like “best blank for blank”, that term gets say 800 searches per month.

    Too my surprise, I started getting a lot more sales recently and noticed that the same page is also ranking for the keyword “blank for blank” which gets a whopping 12,000 searches.

    Atm its in spot 6# for that keyword.

    Just wondering if building anchor texts of “blank for blank” would actually influence my “best blank for blank” page to rank higher in the SERPS when someone types in “blank for blank”?

    Its also to my understanding, a partial anchor, because the “best” is missing, and therefore safer…I think?

    Anyway jw if the words of anchor text from backlinks influence the same words if they are entered into search queries from users? If that makes sense.

    • Hi Mike, thanks for the comment! Before I answer your questions, just want you to know that I “blanked” out your keywords. Don’t ever reveal your money niche on any Internet marketing site or forum because there are a lot of trolls that will try to piggy back off your success.

      Building exact match anchors for “blank for blank” would influence the ranking of the longer tail version. In this instance, I usually try to dominate the long tail and then naturally the more challenging keyword ends up ranking. Just make sure your title tag is something like “Best Blank for Blank” – and you’ll end up ranking for both without a problem.

      Make sure you focus on diversifying the anchors though. Don’t use a ton of EM anchors. Throw in a lot of variations: “womens blank for blank”, “best womens blank for blank”, etc.

      I’m actually conducting two case studies to test if we even need to use exact match anchors anymore to rank. I’m seeing a lot of results with using variations only, so I’ll keep you posted on that.

  11. What anchor text do i use when linking out to an authority site like facebook or cnn etc?

  12. that’s a great post ! i loved the idea how you distributed the anchor texts based on the platforms and priority :)

    • Thanks for the comment Pravash!

    • That’s one thing for sure, the other is putting all this info into action and actually see what happens as a lot of people here are already asking questions on their existing seo campaigns, no one said any results based on this yet one mentioned already doing the things said here except for one tip.

      Planning to put this into action and see what happens indeed. Keyword difficulty pretty much high.

      • Thanks for the comment! Let me know how it goes! Don’t forget: anchor text is a small ranking factor. Simply manipulating anchors won’t guarantee improvements in the search engines. You need to look at the big picture.

  13. What do you do if your exact match anchor text is too high? My company’s website is at about 7% according to SEOprofiler.com, with 111 links like that. There are even more keyword variations. What do you suggest that I do?

    • Hi Garit, thanks for the comment. 7% isn’t too bad, but to be safe, you should definitely try to get it well below 5%. You can either dilute your anchors with variations of the primary keyword or just build branded links (which is the safest option). I took at look at your link profile and your exact match anchors are outweighing your branded anchors, and that’s really dangerous / unnatural. About half of your links should be using some sort of variation of your brand / URL.

      Easiest way to decrease your EM anchor percentages is to start submitting your site to traditional directories, business directories, and send out a press release with branded and generic anchored links ONLY.

      Let me know if you need any clarifications and thanks again for the comment!

      – Gotch

  14. Awesome guide Nathan, thanks so much for putting everything all in one place :)

    I wanted to ask a question about keyword anchors for web 2.0’s and yahoo answers. I currently create most of my pages on blogger, yahoo answers and wordpress.com and then I rank those. I was wondering, since I am not promoting a brand, what should I use in it’s place for my 40% of branding anchor text? Also, what is a good number of branding variations to use in a campaign?

    • Mike, thanks for the comment!

      In this instance, you can just go with naked links (30-40% +) and a ton of generic anchor text like “see my WordPress site” or “go to my blogger blog” etc.

  15. Wow, awesome information! Just what I was looking for to set the right keyword spread for inner pages.

  16. hey Gotch i want to ask you about building links frrom forum posting

    • I don’t know exactly what you want to know about posting on forums, but here’s a couple tips: never use commercial anchor text in your forum signatures or profile links. Only use branded or naked URLs. If you’re looking to generate traffic from forums, you have to contribute, provide value to the community, and establish yourself as an authority. There’s no way around this. Forums links are good for diversification, but will never rank you for any keywords.

      • okey thanks that’s what i wanted to ask so the market that i am working on is not that that competitive there are blogs that get around 50k to 100k unique visitors daily just by blasting exact match anchor text in related forum, and i wanted to take a different approach for my blog using forum to create naked and brand varition and also random anchor texts and use partial match on guest blogs on other forums
        do you think that link from forurms are still safe or not ?

        • Depends on what you’re looking to do. If you’re looking for short term rankings, then there are way better links than forums links for getting a site to rank quickly. As far as a long-term approach, solely using forum links is not a good strategy.

  17. i meant using partial match on related blogs not forums

  18. Faisal imran says:

    Thanks brother!

    you are great writer. understandable posts on your blog. keep it up..

  19. Faisal imran says:

    Hi gotch!!
    I like your blog posts. i visit your blog today by searching in google about backlink building..
    now i am reading all your blog posts.

    Give me the answer of question please!!!

    what is the correct way to build link on web 2.0 ??
    if i build link on “blogspot.com” blogs. (DA: 93 = good)
    so what if a Blog has Low PA and low alexa, and no pr but most relevant
    so what to do ?? should i make backlink from such blog or Panda will kick on ass ??

    • Hi Faisal, thanks for the comment.

      I highly recommend you read my post about manually building web 2.0s: http://www.gotchseo.com/manual-web-2-0-creation/

      Web 2.0s are safe as long as you create them manually, use “unique” content, and don’t crazy with anchor text.

      • Faisal imran says:

        thanks for Reply..
        another question ??
        how much backlinks we can make on single post (for web 2.0 / article directories).

        and how much backlinks are enough per day ??

        • don’t go over 3 per day to keep low link velocity and not trigger any Google alarm

          • Dear sir,
            If i built 3 backlinks per day its mean there is 90 backlinks per month.Is it ranked my website on the specific low competition of search Volume 1000-1500.?
            Thank you

          • Haris, it’s hard for me to say man. There are a lot of factors other than the quantity of your link building. Are the links high-quality? Are they relevant? Are they contextual? What type of anchor text distribution have you used?

  20. Hi Gotch,

    this is finally a very clear instruction about handling the anchortext. Great! When you do the backlinking, do you use multiple tiers (e.g. for the web2.0s). And if you use a 2nd or even 3rd tier, which kind of anchortext do you use therefor?

  21. Phillip Dumont says:

    What if the keyword your targeting is for example toaster review and your domain is a partial emd toasterreviewed.com

    Do you run the risk of being penalized for keyword anchor over optimization, and having your ranking for toaster review removed by google, if you create many naked backlinks such as http://www.toasterviewed.com or toasterviewed.com or just toasterreviewed simply because both the naked url and your brand names contains your targeted keyword.

    • Hi Phillip, thanks for the comment. EMDs and partial match domains are tricky and you can get penalized for over-optimization very easily. The best way to combat this problem is you’re using a PMD, is build a ton of generic anchors. In my experience, you’ll be pretty safe with naked links as well.

    • Geoff McCabe says:

      Phillip, in my experience you have to be very careful using EMD anchor text. For example, I have a website that’s something like northcaliforniasurfing.com I created too many exact match anchor text links such as “North California Surfing”. They are legitimate links from good, relevant sites, and perhaps only 20 of them, but my site has an algorithmic penalty for that search term “north california surfing”, because probably 70-80% of my total links had this anchor text. So, I have gone back and changed most of them to be raw URL links, and am waiting now around 2 months to see if the penalty disappears. So far it hasn’t. Also, I have another website with a manual penalty that has a similar issue. It’s something like sooperresort.com Years ago I created too many anchor texts links such as “yoga retreats” and “yoga teacher training”. We have removed or changed most of the bad links, but have been rejected twice for reconsideration. So that means, Google has so far given us 6 specific examples of the links to our site that it doesn’t like. In all 6 cases, the example links were ones such as “yoga retreats” or “yoga teacher training” that didn’t contain our brand. We also have many links with anchor texts such as “sooper yoga retreats”, “sooper yoga resort”, “sooper yoga teacher training” and these “mixed brand” links have never been used by Google as an example of a bad link to us. So, I feel that Google is much more flexible with the branded links. Also, I should mention that none of their examples have ever been deep links such as to our pages like sooperresort.com/yoga-retreats, even though we have many anchor text links with “yoga retreats” as deep links. All six examples were to our index page.

  22. Faisal imran says:

    Hi Gotch,

    I did not understand that point

    (High-Quality: High PR Links: exact match, keyword variations)

    what you mean high pr link.

    from article directories, guest posting, wikis ??
    we can get High pr links from these Plat forms ????

    • He means private blog networks
      the point is that you’ll place the exact match in you most valuable links

      and also i have a question for you Gotch
      please do tell me if you think that this is a good idea and won’t get me penalized
      i will try to rank for a keyword in my own language for blogger templates
      and i will place a link in the footer with my brand name

  23. Useful info. Fortunate me I found your web site by accident, and I am shocked why this coincidence did not happened
    in advance! I bookmarked it.

  24. Very good tips but from long time i confuse about LSI keywords, i understand that i should not use the same keyword many times on my website and i actually use different keywords but what should i do if the text was look like keyword and if i change it, that will destroy the article?

  25. Dear sir,
    I write 3 articles on web 2.0 websites.And i used this type of ancher diversity
    small dog cage is my exact keyword
    I used small dogs cage point to my homepage and small doggy cage to authority website such as wikipedia.In the same way i used small dog cage point to subpage of my website and another link of ancher text small dog crate to amazon
    In short i didn’t used exact match keyword but i used related words. But my exact match keyword is small dog cage.Is it good anchor tect diversity?
    Reply as soon as possible
    Thank you

    *** I removed your keywords to protect your niche. I replaced them with sample keywords so other people can still learn from your comment

    • Haris, your anchor diversity is good. Just make sure you aren’t targeting two pages on your site for the same keyword and also make sure you throw in generic and branded anchor text.

      • I don’t understand what do you want to say in these lines”also know you are throw in generic and brand name ancher text
        Thank you

        • Haris, in the post I explain how to diversify your anchor text correctly by using generic and branded anchor text

          • Dear sir,
            Thanks for this valuable information.
            But there is one request with you that you give us the excel sheet which contain links and search terms,a great work.Kindly also make a 30 days schedule in which every day you tell what we have to do..where to post with some suggestion and tips so that all the readers used excel more favourable.Thiscan be possible in ebook.Please sir this is a request to you
            Reply as soon as possible
            Thank you

  26. Hi Nathan

    Excellent article and I can confirm that the keyword anchor text percentages you mention are about right based on my experience with our customers.

  27. Hi Gotch! Just finishing my first backlink audit and wasn’t sure about disavowing two sites that have dozens of backlinks to us:

    1) M.biz: a legit or trusted site? It looks like a Chinese search engine and we have about 50 links pointing back from it. Moz gives it a Domain Authority around 55 but it looks spammy

    2) Is essential-oils.com worth disavowing? Our niche is essential oils and we have dozens of backlinks from different pages pointing back to us from all sorts of foreign language pages. So on the one hand, the relevancy seems good, but on the other hand the site looks old, has low Moz domain authority (22) and the foreign language aspect seems like a negative.

    • Hi Garit, thanks for the comment.

      1) That’s a tough one and it will probably be hard to get those links actually removed. I doubt it’s hurting you unless there are exact match anchors.

      2) Personally, I think disavowing is a waste of time. If your site is penalized, then you’re always going to have that baggage on the site and it will still be hard to rank. It’s easier to rank a brand new website than it is to recover a penalized domain.

  28. This is of great help. I have been slapped with the Penguin twice even after i diluted my anchor text. But now I have a strategy to look forward to without fear. Thanks for the great info.

  29. Hey Nathan whats up! I was wondering I’m working on a few inner pages right now and was wondering , my brand percent is the highest at 30% right now at the moment and main keyword is 12% and generics are still a small percent. How can i dilute that main keyword some more, Like what kinds of platforms can i build generics with. Are do follow blog comments safe to point at money site or what would you recommend thank you!!

  30. It is refeshing to find someone who is not afraid of the much maligned web directory links. I own a couple dozen directories and am so sick of link removal requests that i considered shutting some of them down. It has been my impression as well that the directories themselves that are the problem, but the anchor texts (done mostly pre-penguin) that are to blame.

    • Steve, thanks for the comment. I love directories :) – perfect for building branded anchor text. Anchor text is almost ALWAYS the problem, not the links. You’re on point with that.

      – Gotch

  31. Hey Nathan! thanks for the awesome post! I am having problems pillowing my site, I have a day job and really dont have time to learn GSA or similar tools. Getting someone to do it can be expensive in the longrun. All I can think of now is using just web 2.0 accounts only for diversifying my anchor. Is it ok to just use web 2.0 ? or will it be allot better if I also build tier 2 and tier 3 ? Can you recommend me the best option for diversity ? Thanks :)

    • Hi Max, thank you for the comment. In all honesty, pretty much anything works for pillowing because it’s very unlikely that you would get penalized for using unoptimized anchor text. I typically use web 2.0s, article directories, social bookmarks, web directories, blog comments, and press releases to dilute anchor text. Like I said, pretty much anything lol

      Note: I would avoid using GSA on tier one unless you’re trying to churn and burn, which isn’t really working anymore with GSA.

  32. Hi Nathan I like your post here, its a great job ur doing helping ppl out. I highly recommend to anyone here to follow ur advise and strategy. I was wondering and I know your very busy here!!! Would it be possible to get some advice from you? I have been doing seo for around 5+ years and im always looking for like minded people to share ideas will it be possible for you to perhaps email me and have a skype chat?

  33. Dimitris says:

    Hi Nathan

    thanks one more time for value information about anchor link building,i would like to ask you when check my %anchor into the tool as ahref,which % anchor have i look?The anchor % from referring domains or anchor for referring pages?

    If i look the %anchor for referring pages is bigger percent as referring domains because i see that i take a couple of links for 1 website tha grow the anchor% from referring pages

    thanks

  34. Hello Gotch.

    Please tell me what “Brand Name Anchors” is and give me some examples of “Brand Name Anchors”

    Thank you very much!

  35. Thank you Nathan, you are a legend.

    even SEO gurus wont put up all of these amount of information for free. they would rather sell it as WSO on warrior.

    I have some questions, I hope you wont mind to answer.
    do you link out to authority sites or relevant sites from each blog post?
    is it mandatory to link out from each post ?

    Do you offer online consultation? if you do, how can we contact you?

    • Niz, thank you for the kind words and the comment :)

      If you’re trying to rank a page, then linking out is a good idea because it makes your blog post appear to be a resource. If you’re talking about in guest posts or with private blog network posts, it’s also good because it reduces footprints and also makes the linking article appear to be resources.

      You can use my contact page: http://www.gotchseo.com/contact/

      Thanks!

      – Gotch

  36. Thanks! For very high quality links (such as guest post), don’t you think it’d be a waste using generic/bare URL?

    Thanks Gotch, great post btw!

    • Damien, thanks for the comment and good question. Back in day, it would have been a waste, but thanks to co-occurence, Google can now give credit / understand a link without you needing to use a keyword-rich anchor. That’s why it is critical that the content surrounding your anchor is highly relevant.

  37. I’ve got a tricky question. If I use competition’s name or/and domain name as anchor text, will I be penalized as soon as big G finds such link ?

    • Jays, thanks for the comment. No, you wouldn’t be penalized

      • I’m all the time afraid that’s a real gray zone, as checking if anchor is a domain name and corresponds to href value is a very simple task.
        From the other hand, G search engine seems to cut off the TLD, and just consider the raw domain name in SERPs.
        If I had enough time to give a real shot on this ….

  38. Hi Nathan

    Just i have finished Anchor text Bible and already feel stronger,thank you.

    I would like to ask you 3 questions…a) when distribute my anchor in a local market,specific in a Greek Local Market for a new site(eg personalpress.gr this site have greek content),could i use branded and naked links from properties you recommended or i have to use only greek properties?(greek directories,Greek blogs etc)

    b)As phrase and exact anchor i use Greek properties with Greek content (pbns,web2.0)
    For Tier 2 links(link to tier1 greek content) can i use English content?

    c)Could i buy expired com domains and use them with Greek content as Tier 1 in local market?

    thanks

    • Dimitris, that makes me really happy to hear!

      a) it definitely ideal to have links from Greek properties with the .gr extensions, but the .com, .net, etc. extensions will help as well. You should focus your efforts on getting .gr links if you’re trying to rank for cities within Greece.
      b) Once again, Greek would be best, but English will work as well. Google can understand both
      c) You SHOULD do this

      – Gotch

  39. Hello Gotch.
    Thank you for this article.

    You said that you’re using Web Directories and Article Directories for link building.
    Are these Web Directories and Article Directories good for link building? Really?

    I will start to use them, but tell me some suggestions, PLEASE. 😀

    Thanks.

  40. Excellent article! I did not pay much attention to keyword diversification after the Penguin update, that may be the reason some of my sites are messed up. Well, I will try to implement the concept presented throughout your post. Thanks for opening my eyes on that.

  41. Much appreciated for your excellent guide on the strategy that you use for diversifying anchors when building links.
    Thanks Nathan, sincerely mean it.

    Could I please ask though:

    What is the treatment of links made with no textual content, just with an image, for example most of the directories in my niche have link banners made up of simply an image wrapped in a link to your site?

    To make myself clear, is this guide 50% brand – 20% url – 20% generic – 5% LSI – 5% EMA using percentages of just the links which have textual anchors? Is it independent of image links?

    The problem I am facing is that different SEO programmes use different methods to work out % shares of anchors in backlinks, some don’t count the image links, whereas others such as ahrefs include image links with no text, listing something like .

    I am trying to help my client’s site to have a more natural link profile since we got hit hard by penguin back in October 2013. Two different SEOs and they still haven’t addressed the issue of getting the EMA down to a low level.

    So using spyglass software I’m getting a list of all the site’s links, then trying to work out how many generic or naked urls will be needed to bring EMA % share of anchors down. I’m getting stuck on whether to have the no text/ image links in my analysis.

    I suppose the answer lies in how Google would treat the image links. Whether it would include this links when calculating the percentage of EMA% anchors or would it just solely look at all the non-empty text based anchors?

    Again, I appreciate your assistance, I haven’t found a good post such as yours anywhere, thanks and god bless.

    • Dan, thanks for the comment!

      Google uses the ALT tag for the anchor text in images. Images are included within those percentages. If you have over-optimized image anchor text, then just change them to branded or delete them all together.

      Hope that makes sense,

      – Gotch

      • Thanks Nathan, so this naturally leads me to ask: how would empty Alt tags be treated in the construction of models that monitor the distribution of links among the categories BRAND / URL / GENERIC / LSI / EMA ?

  42. I’m sorry Nathan, I didn’t mean to put any link in my first comment/question. I was trying to say how ahrefs list images when they list the anchor phrases. I’m sorry for causing you any trouble for that, I just saw my comment, and the whole of the bottom part was a link, as I was trying to say *code*a* no text *end code*.

    Sorry once again, as you can probably tell I don’t comment much on sites, hence made a beginner mistake!

    Thanks,

    Dan

  43. Hi Nathan, I have a question about branded anchor text. What if your brand contains your main keyword? For example, “Best Main Keyword Guide”. So, it’s basically a keyword variation or will Google recognize this as a brand? If not, would you suggest replacing branded anchor text with naked urls and generic anchors?

    • Hi Sean, thanks for the comment! What you’re saying would be considered a partial match domain/brand and so you would need to be careful. With any exact or partial match domain, you need to alter the percentages and throw in more generic and naked link anchor text

  44. How about links at the bottom of a page linking back to the top of the page?

  45. Hey, i am a regular reader and learn lots of seo stuff through your blog. Can you also help us to know how much anchor text percentage can we use on churn and burn campaign to get more effective results.

  46. Gotch SEO is right on the money. I’ve used this strategy on some incredibly hard keywords 400.000 + searches a month and it works!

  47. Great article! I have a question about anchor percents. You haven’t written anything about partial match domains where main anchor is for example: “Internet Marketing” and domain is for example internetadvertiesment.com or advertiesmentininternet.com. I am afraid that using 40-50% brand name anchors can get penalty for main keyword: Internet Marketing. What do you think about it?

  48. Hey Gotch, I’ve been following your blog and I’m really impressed with all the tips and advices that you’ve shared with your readers.
    I’ve been testing this strategy on one of my moneysite (drip feed links with only branded, partial & long tail anchor text over a month) and I’ve noticed some improvement in rankings although I never put exact match anchor (however KW with MS> 2k still N/A). I will put 5-10 “PBN” links with exact match anchor to see the effects next week.

    I’ve some questions here,

    I’ve noticed that if you build web 2.0s as your tier 1 links, it rarely shows up in Majestic and Ahrefs. Do you noticed that as well? Or maybe I’ve done something wrong? This makes it difficult for me to check my anchor text ratio.. Don’t recommend me to use Webmaster Tools since I hate them! (LOL) and I’m a bit skeptical using WMT on my site. I believe Google can spy any BlackH/GreyH activities on your site.

    Another thing is, I’ve thinking of a new strategy to save my site in case someone “negative SEO’d” my site (and at the same time help them ranking strongly). Do you mind emailing me your contact so that I can discuss with you on this? I really want to hear some advices/recommendations from someone who have lot of experience in SEO.

    Regards,
    Nizam

  49. Hi Gotch.
    I wondered if you would place more than 1 link to the site your trying to rank from a PBN article. i.e. if in the article you linked to the site from 1. partial match anchor 2. Naked URL and 3. Link an image ?

    And wound this count as 3 links? (in terms of tracking anchor text percentages)

    Thanks so much.
    I find you blog really helpful and precise!

    • Peter, thanks for the comment!

      I actually do this pretty frequently. I use my best anchor text first and will use the next 1-2 to dilute. It works very well. I just wouldn’t link out three times to the same page very often from the same PBN article because it could be a footprint – mix it up

      – Gotch

  50. It’s still an excellent article, Gotch! This guide is “epic”. It’s true. I’ve ever read your Anchor-text to defeat hostile Penguins months ago. This newest article is best of the best. Thanks man for contributing to the community such a perfect guide.

  51. Hi there,

    Great stuff… i know that anchor text are important but don’t know how can I manipulate them. Thanks for the great article. I have subscribe your blog please keep posting such a useful content.

  52. Regarding trying to recover from over optimized anchor text, it looks like all the solutions to fix the problem that you mention in the article would involve spam (press releases less so, but still not exactly high quality). You don’t think that by ‘solving’ your anchor text problem, you could be creating a bad backlink profile problem?

    • Tyson,

      We’ve actually refined our dilution strategy, but didn’t have a chance to update the post. It’s updated now, so take a look. Thanks for the comment and logical analysis :)

  53. Hi Nathan,

    This is a very interesting one. I got my site hit by a “was previously” cute birdie, Penguin 3.0. I already used exact match keywords for directories and Press Releases. Do you think it’s a good idea to resubmit for article directories and press releases in the right way to dilute anchor text?

    Already submitted some of the bad links, but do you think I should disavow all these “wrong” Press Releases and article directories?

    Many thanks

    • Lisa, thanks for the comment and sorry to hear about your troubles.

      I updated the section on penalty recovery which will help. For this scenario, I would try to change the keyword-rich anchors on the directories to branded anchors. Most press releases are NoFollow and will be a challenge to get removed. I would just send out another press release with unoptimized anchors while building the other links I mentioned in the updated section.

      Let me know if you have more questions. Thanks!

      • Hey Nathan, what is your opinion on using the same sites over and over again to dilute different pages on your site?

        For instance, I have 4 pages I want to rank on my site. If I use 1 press release targeting two pages, can I use a second press release, which will have links from the same sites, for the other two pages? What about profiles, bookmarks, and web 2.0’s? Does this become a red flag?

        I hope you see what I am getting at here. I don’t want to just rank a single page :)

        • Hey Robert, thanks for the question and comment – if the press release is hitting different pages each time, then it will be fine. If possible, you should try to get as many different unique IPs

  54. Really Interesting article on Anchor Text and one of the best I have ever read. It took me almost more than 2 hrs. to read the whole article.
    This should be an Ebook instead of a Blog article.
    Thank you

  55. Great Guide, Really enjoyed reading and easy to follow! Cheers

  56. Really insightful post. I’ve not long launched my first website (just over a year ago) and never really thought too much about varying my anchor text. I suppose the way I post has always been quite natural, which in some ways may work in my favour, but it may have prevented me from ranking much higher. This has really opened my eyes about how anchor text can benefit my rankings – or completely ruin my website.

    Thanks for sharing and I’ll be sure to check back soon.

  57. Fantastic viable article. Right to the point. Way to go man

  58. Thanks for the post, very useful! One question, when you mention %1 exact match etc are you referring to referring domains or total backlinks for the percentages?

    Best regards

  59. Hi Gotch,

    Thanks for the article! In terms of anchor text % ratio, is this the % of referring domains and links?

    Regards

  60. Hi Nathan
    Im halfway through Your post but I can wait to ask this about:
    Section III
    Anchor Text Percentages
    Thing is Ive submited my website to directories, and for title I used long anchors, 5-7 words describing my service.
    It wasnt my intent becouse when I was submiting I didnt know so much about anchors, I was writting something that will describe service I offer so now I have 5 long anchors variatins (among other links ofcourse):
    1. Variation 9%
    2. Variation 5%
    3. Variation 2%
    4. Variation 2%
    5. Variation 2%
    (total 20%)

    Rest of links are:
    24 % Generic Anchors
    36% Naked Links
    4% no anchor
    16 % brand name

    I know its not all about anchor text, but also where they come from.
    I removed some of direcotry links and Im using ahrefs to check my links (I think links are still in ahrefs anchor cloud becouse of ahrefs “memory effect” when showing links) but anyway just by looking at my link profile as it is (never mind ahrefs “memory effect” ) what is Your advice?
    Im confused about Long Anchors and if google treat them as Exact Match Anchors?

    • Filip,

      Thanks for the comment. It’s only an exact match anchor if it exactly matches the keyword in your title tag on-site. From what you’re describing, your “long” anchor will is really just a variation. In the future, you should only use branded anchor text for directory links and keep your keyword-based anchors for your most powerful links.

      – Gotch

  61. One of the best article, I have ever read on internet. Your piece of content has boost my concepts regarding anchor text.

  62. Hey Gotch!

    Awesome free content you have here Im learning a TON from this website. Quick question looking at my domain URL would you consider it a PMD or EMD? Also I noticed you put percentages to follow for EMD’s but what are the percentage guidelines to follow for a PMD like mine?

    • Aaron,

      thanks for the comment and I’m really happy you’re learning from my content! As far as your domain name, it’s in-between an EMD and PMD because you’re technically targeting two different keywords within the URL. A PMD would have more filler words, so you’re domain is definitely leaning towards exact match. The percentages are going to be pretty much the same for both EMD and PMD because it’s very easy to over-optimize if you’re careful.

      – Gotch

  63. Hello, After reading your post, I am very glad that today i learn many things in Anchor Text, and hope it is very useful and apply same techniques which you taught in this Article…..
    You are doing an Awesome Job….
    Can you tell me one thing: How many Anchor Text Keyword’s with variances i can in keep in my home page and what is the percentage of that, I am also asking the inner Pages, Anchor Text Strategy. what is the percentage between home page and Inner pages Anchor Text. Please guide me as much as you Can..

    Many Thanks…

  64. Hey Nathan,

    thanks for this amazing guide! However I have a really specific question. In your articel you differntiate between EMDs and PMDs. Unfortunatley I could not find anything about the ankertext distribution for PMDs. For example I have a domain name like this: Bobbycarboss.com
    Now I want to rank for bobby car in general and also for bobby car test. However with a Partial Match Domain I should be careful that I do not overoptimize so I cannot just use a naked link since my domain contains bobbycar, is that correct? Now I wonder how you would distribute the ankertext for such a domain. Furthermore I wonder if I can also overoptimize when I use naked links quite often? For example if I link to http://www.bobbycarboss.com/bobbycar-test. I will have 2x Bobbycar in my Ankertext, does this matte or is this already overoptimized towards bobbycar?

    Could you please let me know how you would deal with such a specific case? Would you stick to the following ankertext distribution? Or would you decrease the precentage of naked links and increase the percentage of generic ankertext?

    Branded / Exact Match Anchors: 1-5%
    LSI: 5%
    Partial Match: 5%
    Generic: 40%
    Naked Links: 40%

    Thanks for your help,

    Lukas

    • Lukas,

      Thank you for the kind words.

      The anchor text percentages will resemble an EMD, so you’ll want to have high percentages of generic anchor text and naked links. This will keep you safe from over-optimization

  65. Hi Nathan,

    First of all, many thanks for this epic post!

    I’m writing up a press release to promote a new website. I’m using four links. One naked URL and one branded link to the home page.

    The other two links are for two separate internal pages. For these I was going to use exact keyword anchor text, but after reading your guide, I’ve changed my mind to brand + keyword anchor.

    As an example, with “blue widgets review” and “how to sell pink widgets” being the target keywords, the anchor texts would read “blue widgets review by Mysite.com” and “How to sell pink widgets article on Mywebsite.com”.

    Would you recommend this.

    Many thanks in advance.

    Sean O

  66. Thank you very much, will start my new link bilding strategy with your advice in mind. The most detalied link building strategy that I read. Ever!

  67. Thank you for the post. That’s a very good article. But still I have a question about anchor text, if you don’t mind.

    For example, I optimize my site for keyword “curling iron” and other synonyms like, “curly hair plate”, “professional curling iron”, “professional curly hair plate” “curly hair machine” “iron wave”, and so on, and all these keywords point to the same link address: http://www.example.com/curling-iron/. Could I use three of these keywords as anchor text in an article with about 300 words? Could there be a problem using same link for different keywords in one article?

    I look forward to your reply in this regard.

    Thank you!

    • Thanks for the comment Gabriel!

      You can definitely use those keywords as anchors, but I would create a unique article each time. Don’t link to the target page more than once from the same article, and you should consider using longer content for your backlinks. It makes a big difference.

  68. Is shared hosting ok for a private blog network? I’ve been debating between different packages and am I trying to identify the most cost efficient method. For example, if I’m building a PBN of 5 different blogs, would I choose 5 different hosting providers for all 5 of them and would these need dedicated ip’s? Or could I use one hosting package on a shared server with a reputable provider? Or for a third option could I create 5 different shared hosting packages with the same provider?

    Additionally, when it comes to building links to PBN’s should I follow the same rules as linking to my main site? Or can I use a tiered linking system with a network of web 2.0’s supported by tools like FCS Networker and GSA?

    I’d appreciate any advice you can provide as this is my first foray into SEO.

    • Nick,

      Thanks for the comment! Yes, shared hosting is okay for ONE domain. You should have separate hosting for every domain in your network. You wouldn’t need dedicated IPs if you’re using new hosts every time because each one is going to give you a unique IP. As far as tier two links, you can follow the strategies in my post and you’ll increase the authority of your domains even further.

      – Gotch

      • For simplicity I guess I was thinking of hosting all the blogs on the same provider such as bluehost or hostgator but creating a different hosting plan for each of them. Essentially paying for 5 different hosting plans but all under the same provider. Do you think this would cause issues? I’ve heard of issues with C blocks being heavily reused with certain hosts.

  69. Hi I wanted to get your feedback on this article at this site http://godofseo.ca/research/pbns-deindexed/#axzz3KusTVR00 . The author is saying that you should avoid using bot blockers like Spyder Spanker or using robot.txt for your PBNs because doing so leaves a big footprint and then shows a simple process of how to find PBN sites that are using bot blockers saying that with this reverse engineering anyone could uncover a person’s whole network of PBN’s this way. He’s saying that the bot blockers put your PBN at risk and makes them an easy target for Google. What are your thoughts about the things he brings up in his article? If you don’t have a bot blocker then your site will show up in Ahrefs, Majestic SEO, etc. In light of the issues he raises, what do you suggest?

    • Hi Michael, I actually agree with him. Anything that causes a footprint could compromise your network. If you create quality niche relevant network sites, then your competitors won’t even be able to tell the difference. If you want to throw off your competition, then just block 50% of your sites and leave the blocker off the other 50%, but make them premium quality.

      – Gotch

  70. Hi, Gotch, Fatima Again, If could help me out by sharing a complete Link Building Checklist which is going to work in the year 2015.
    Please if you can, I am really needful for this, You can e-mail at: fatimafatima1786@gmail.com

    Many Thanks
    Fatima

  71. Hey Nathan
    thank you for this amazing guide. I have a really specific question.

    I have two sites that had been penalized almost a year ago. I never found any messages in the webmaster’s area so I can only guess it was an algorithm triggered penalty. When those sites got penalized my first reaction was to delete the 2 domains (PBN) that had all off the 25,000+ exact match backlinks pointing to these sites but then I decided it wasn’t worth to wait for the ban to be lifted so I went ahead and made a third one to start fresh but with a more careful strategy. My third site is currently at the bottom places of page1 results for my targeted keywords in a very competitive niche.

    It’s now 3-4 days that the two first sites that had been penalized are back on the serps at pages 3 and 4 for the same targeted keywords (all three sites are of the same niche) so I suppose the ban has finally been lifted. What do you advice me to do?

    a) 301 redirect the two old sites to the new one
    b) place 2 or 3 naked anchor links on each one of the old sites pointing to the new
    c) place 2 or 3 naked anchor NoFollow links on each one of the old sites pointing to the new
    d) do nothing as they may put the new site in trouble.

    Thanking you in advance,
    Dimitri.

  72. Nathan, the title didn’t disappoint for sure! I’ve read a lot of articles on anchor text over the years, your’s is by FAR the best. Appreciate all the hard work and time you put into this one. It’s actually my first time here. Taken a lot away from your article. Impressive!!

  73. I just had to say that this a a great article. I have a website that while, it ranks “ok” it just never seems to get into the top 3 and I am thinking that the information you have here will help me fix that.

    thanks for sharing

  74. hi,
    is the guidelines in this article applicable for internal-linking? the web site that i responsible for in company take account on internal linking. for example is it OK to use branded anchor link about 50 percent in a page?

  75. Imdadul Haq says:

    Hi Nathan Gotch

    I always read your each blog very carefully and can know something new. I have a SEO firm and working for some of my clients. I always do implementation of your strategies for each of my client. But I have a question to know and the question is:

    How can i get power link is not clear to me ? Could you show some sample links and the exact way to get power link ?

    Thanks

  76. Absolutely great article. 2 questions:
    1) Any tools/services you’d suggest for anchor text diluting? I’ve used Social Adr, but maybe there’s anything better?
    2) Any press release service you’d recommend?

    • Marius,

      Thanks for the comment.

      1) BHW has a ton of services you can use to dilute. You can also use Rank Crew for dilution
      2) Email me and I’ll send you one that I use

  77. Hi,

    I have couple question that confused me;

    -Manual link building is doing everything by yourself right? (Not using any tool)
    That is what you’re doing right? But if you’re doing everything by yourself how are you enable to make it like this:

    Example:

    Branded / Exact Match Anchors: 1-5%
    LSI: 5%
    Partial Match: 5%
    Generic: 40%
    Naked Links: 40%

    Making something like this is possible with GSA SER, but manual?? Because you said you’re not using GSA SER for tier one right?

    – Is it okay to use for tier one Web 2.0 / Wiki’s

    – Do you need to have 100+ tier one links or can it also be maybe 10+ high-/quality links?

    Sorry I’m dutch it’s possible that you already answered all those question in your article but it takes some time to really understand it.

    Thanks for making this great article.

    • Mark,

      Thank you for the comment. All of the link building we do is manual and we’re able to keep the percentages accurate because we keep track of our anchor text distribution. We don’t build a ton of links, so it’s very easy to keep track. Using GSA on tier one is a death wish and it’s way better to use RELEVANT and authoritative links over hundreds of low-quality / easy-to-acquire backlinks. Let me know if you have any other questions Mark

  78. What a great article about anchor text. I just bookmarked it. Anchor text is surely a key point in article optimization and ranking.

    Thanks.

  79. Gotch,
    Thanks for your blog and I’m reading this for may be fifth time to understand all of it :)
    3 questions:
    1. You mentioned about 100 back links is enough for low-medium niche. Does it include just the Power Links or all inclusive?
    2. How many times it is okay to link from the same source? If one per source, I would need 100 sources – just making sure.
    3. Is it okay to use automatic tools ( Ulitmate Demon, GSA Ranker ) etc?
    Appreciate your answer.

    • Zee,

      Thanks for the comment.

      1. Every niche is different and it also depends on the quality of the links you’re acquiring. Higher quality and relevancy = less quantity need
      2. You typically don’t want more than 3 or so links from the same IP / domain because it will dilute the effectiveness.
      3. They can help you on the tier two and tier three level if you know how to use them. Just be smart and test your strategies on a dummy site first

  80. Wow, I am impressed. This is truly exhaustive. I just wrote a guide about link attributes. I was going to do a long section on the penguin update and how it affected link anchors but I found your guide and realised there was no way I could match this. I also shared this on my twitter. Kudos this guide must have taken a long time to write.

  81. Hi Nathan,

    Just discovered your blog and I’m amazed by the info I can learn here. Your anchor text post is the best I’ve found anywhere on the web. I’ll be tuning in from now on.

    Thanks,

    Neil

  82. Hi Gotch, fantastic article! I’ve read it several times and will probably read it a few more :)

    I’ve got a question about one of the things you talked about in the area of keyword dilution. I have a new site (about a month old) that I set up unknowingly the old school way (7 articles around a topic, where 4 of the articles are all built and keyworded around the same product name, ie Article 1 “product name”, Article 2 “product name review”, Article 3 “product name ebook”, Article 4 “product name pdf”) So now I know this is the wrong approach but how should I fix it without angering the mighty G? Is it safe to just 301 redirect each of the 3 product name articles back to the main product name article or should I remove the 3 articles (they’ve been indexed) all together?

    Thanks so much!

  83. Epic article, i don’t think there will be an article of this sort ever published to describe Anchor Text, this article can teach about Anchor Text to a toddler!

    • Thank you Anjum!

      • HI Nathan,

        Thank you for providing such clear, concise, and actual to do marketing tips. I really appreciate it. I am curious regarding your thoughts on why your blog post all start with a content section. I guess my take is that you do it for two reason but could be wrong.

        1) Obviously the content section is very valuable for your readers and allows them to navigate through your blog post. So it adds tremendous value to readers.
        2) From an internal linking standpoint this helps you in a number of ways. From creating high quality relevant internal links.

        Those are my thoughts and I might be over thinking this but I would love to hear your view on the question.

        Thanks,
        Errick

  84. Hi Nathan,
    First I’m a huge fan and this article is amazing!
    I have 2 questions please
    1. how come some sites get away with over 30% and sometimes 50% exact match keyword on non EMD domain?
    2. do you think this diversification should be used for building external linking to inner pages like product or category page or I can use more exact matches?

    Thanks a Lot!

    • Hi Tommy,

      Thank you for the comment

      1. Sites get away with all kinds of things they shouldn’t, but that’s the game. Using 50% EMD anchor text is asking for a Penguin penalty.
      2. Using exact match anchor on internal links are fine, but it doesn’t hurt to diversify

  85. Great article Nathan! Thank you very much for posting. Learnt a lot reading it.
    Johanna

  86. Hi Nathan, awesome information !

    1. I have a question about the Exact Match anchor ! Like you said : we need to use only once to rank and Partial Match, LSI around 5% this sound good but now let’s go back to what another persons said to don’t optimize any anchor text : ” don’t optimize anchor texts. I’ve seen optimized anchor texts ruin a site’s SEO through gradual algorithmic penalization.” They said to use only Naked anchor and Branded anchors ! What do you think ?

    2. I also have another question : where we will need to use the exact match anchor ? Will be good if I will use on a WEB2.0 ? You said isn’t good to use on a GUEST POST but will be good to use on a PBN link, why ? Guest posts are the same with PBN the difference is the PBN are private and guest posts are public ! So please tell me where I will need to use this exact match anchor because I’m thinking to buy some powerfull guest posts and I don’t know what to do with exact match anchor !

    3. I have another question but will be more good if I will give to you an example : let’s say I will have 25 powerfull GUEST POSTS and 20 WEB2.0 (where I will add TIER 2), so in total 45 links. What you will do ? You will use the all links with LSI,PARTIAL MATCH and 1 or 2 with exact match anchor and then will do the diversity anchor text with some directories , social bookmarks etc or you will use only 6 from this links (1 exact match, 5 LSI,PARTIAL MATCH) ? I want to say you will won’t lose your power if you will make the 39 links with BRAND,NAKED,GENERIC ?

    What you will do in this case with all 45 links? If you have another suggestion I will be happy to listen you !

    Thank you :)

  87. I already do most of them but link through image without anchor is great idea. If i have Brand Name Ali Recover Reading and my keyword is Recovery Reading it it good or bad idea to have ALI RECOVERY READING as anchor text 30% ?

  88. Hi Nathan, thanks as always for the great content. Two quick questions – I am following your suggestion with press release distrib for anchor text diversity. Do you have a recommended provider (fiverr or elsewhere) for press release submission? Also, I am trying to get some links in my niche (tattoo removal/beauty) – do you have a reputable link broker you can recommend? Rick

  89. Gotch, I must say. This is the absolute best anchor text guide I’ve possibly seen on the internet. Great post and hats off to you!

  90. I have a question that’s a little off topic but I can’t seem to find an answer anywhere.

    I recently took over a site which the previous webmaster had created thousands of links to using his other clients websites. They are all irrelevant sites so I’m worried that they could be hurting rankings. The problem is, there are so few legitimate links to the site, I’m worried removing these thousands of links could be dangerous. To give you an idea of numbers, in webmaster tools I found about 6500 links from his irrelevant sites that I could get removed easily, about 5000 from other random sketchy looking sites and only about 600 legitimate links. Should I have the 6500 removed? The site is doing pretty well traffic-wise, but maybe it could be doing better without them? What else can I do to fix this?

    Thanks!

    • Hi Courtney,

      Thanks for the comment! In all honesty, if it isn’t broke, don’t fix it. Have the link set on tap, so that IF the site is hit, you can quickly recover. You should consider how you would get the links removed in a worse case scenario. But if the site is currently performing well, don’t start removing links.

  91. Indeed very detailed article, exactly the one I was looking for. Thank you ! :)

  92. Great Content :-) Simply Amazing . Thanks a lot for such great work !
    One small Question – I have my Website- for certain keywords it ranks well in US on Yahoo and Bing on first page but on 5th page in UK for same keywords and It do not rank at all on Google for same keywords . I have good local presence like Gplus and directories presence still this happens . Any Suggestions ?

    • Thank you Ale!

      If you’re ranking well in Yahoo and Bing, but not Google, there’s a good chance your link profile isn’t high quality. I need more details about the links you’ve used to help you :)

  93. Hey Nathan, I was wondering If I used a Press Release service and get about 1-300 links with my URL since im using an EMD I didn’t use brand keyword. I was wondering after that is using some dofollow manual blog comments for my Generic keywords seem ok? I was gonna use my personal PBN for my money keywords but im kinda confused like how to keep my exact match keywords at like 1% any advice? Also im not sure what kinds of links to build for my LSI keywords? Thanks for your help!

    • Hi Andrew,

      Thanks for the comment. Press releases with unoptimized anchor text are fine, but I wouldn’t use DoFollow blog comments on tier one. Personally, we use business citations and social platforms to build quality unoptimized links

  94. Great article and useful to lots of people I’m sure. Everyone has there own idea’s about seo but it’s 100% true you cannot get away from anchor text diversity. Much needed.

  95. Aurelien says:

    Amazing article !
    The situation I am in is a bit particular, and I would have loved how you would handle anchor text startegy in my case:
    My main website is my company, and several products get user friendly domain aliases redirected to my brand:
    product1.com –> 301 –> mycompany.com/product1
    product2.com –> 301 –> mycompany.com/product2

    Can I take profit of such a configuration to add diversity ? How do you think google will handle naked links on product1.com / product2.com compared to mycompany.com ?

  96. Nathan,
    Just wanted to say a big thank you for this anchor text article. Hands down the best article I’ve ever found on the “right” link building strategies a sit owner should be using. Thanks again.

  97. Read till section 4 and must say amazing work Nathon…

    I just have a small question :- PBN from sites which were de-indexed for some time vs from sites which weren’t like Auction. Hold the same strength, plus both have quality link profile…?

  98. GREAT STUFF Nathan! Quick question, if you had a website and its homepage is basically all about the brand, while its subpages are targeting different keyword. How would your link building and anchor text strategy be? I mean will you focus more on sending branded anchor links to the homepage which eventually shifts the juice to subpages?

    • Thank you Mark!

      The majority of your anchors going to the homepage should be branded. You can internally link from the homepage with exact match anchor to your internal pages. This will flow link equity

  99. Hey dude, love this article! I’ve been going through your blog and its epic as hell.

    I was wondering how you deal with city landing pages. Do you adhere to the same anchor text percentages for the page itself?

    I’m currently working on ranking a landing page for a major city for a client, and I realize I’ve been too aggressive with the partial match anchors. So I’m sending more branded anchors in for the next month for the client and saving the partial anchor texts for editorial links which I’ve been purchasing, and will continue doing so since they work really well.

    One thing I struggle with is anchor diversity on city landing pages. Since its pretty much a landing page, its hard to get natural links for, and directories typically want you to to link to the homepage. Blog comments link work but they’re pretty much dofollow, and I think it looks a bit suspicious if most of your nofollow links are generic, but the dofollow links are partial matches. I’m thinking web 2.0s and profile links are basically the major options I have.

    • Thank you so much!

      I diversify my anchors on a page-by-page basis. PBN links are definitely a good options for city landing pages. You should also link to the city landing pages from the homepage to send link equity, which will make ranking easier

  100. Hey Nathan! GREAT Article. I have been building niche websites for about 9 months now and have been slowly ranking them on Google.

    I have a few EMDs… you are the FIRST to point this error out to me. Like my keyword is “productgrowfaster” and my domain is “learnhowtoproductgrowfaster” Would that be considered an EMD or PMD? If so I am over optimized with brand/exact/broad keyword anchor text. From what I read it sounds like it’s okay to change some of those brand/exact/broad keyword anchor texts on my PBNs to a URL/Generic anchor text to correct my anchor text profile? That doesn’t raise a red flag??

    It also sounds like I have keyword dilution! I have my homepage targeting “Product Name” then my 2nd page targeting “ProductName” and my 3rd page targeting “Buy Product Name.” I have actually been sitting on spot 11 for ALL of those keyterms for a month of so. I have been adding brand/generic links to my PBNs over the past few weeks but haven’t see a budge yet. How would you correct this?

    Thank you in advance! This article has been the BEST and most helpful article I have read yet regarding anchor text profile.

    • Lindsay,

      Thanks for the comment!

      That would be considered a PMD. You can change anchor text, but I wouldn’t do it in bulk because it can definitely be a footprint. You definatiely have keyword dilution if you’ve created pages for each variation of the keyword. Redirect the others to the page that’s performing the best and modify the META information to encompass “buy” and other LSI keywords.

  101. Hi,

    Tks for this wonderful post.

    I want to build Tier 1 with Web 2.0, What’s anchor ratios you suggest ?
    Should I put link to the money site in every article ?
    how many links to the money site I can make to every article ?

  102. This posts really help me in understanding about anchor test and really help me to recover from Google Penalty. Thanks!

  103. Fantastic article on anchor text. I use them often but going to adjust my strategy after reading this. One of the more helpful articles on SEO I’ve read in a long time. Thanks so much for the obvious effort you put into writing it! Much appreciated

  104. This may have been stated but I cannot see it….
    Any percentages/ratio of links to the root of a domain vs the rest of the domain…

  105. I have a site that recovered after doing a disavow of all spammy directories. I once used software to spam directories, which triggered the penguin algorithm. My question now is whether I can start building keyword-rich anchors again (at a low frequency, of course)? Or, does the spammy anchor text profile remain – even though the actual backlinks have been disavowed?

    • Hi Daniel,

      Thanks for the comment. Keep in mind, although you disavowed the directories, those links still exist. If you went out and got those links removed, I could without certainty say that you can start using keyword-rich anchors. HOWEVER, for your particular situation, you should really focus on building a strong branded anchor text profile. Like 80-90% branded anchors before even thinking about using keywords in your anchors. This will build trust for your site

      • Thanks for your response – highly appreciated! Also, just wondering about the excel file you provided – does each link in the first column correspond to a different domain? How would I input links that have my site on several inner pages of their site?

  106. Hi Nathan,

    Thanks for this article. Actually I landed on this article because I was looking for information about anchors when commenting on blogs because I feel it’s very spammy when people put keywords or the name of their website as anchors. But I was wondering if it’s good to always put my firstname as anchor when commenting on blogs. What’s your take on that ? I see here you anchored your twitter account, do you alternate between your twitter account and http://www.gotchseo.com ?

    • Hi Emile,

      Thanks for the comment! It’s definitely spammy. First name or first and last name are both fine. It really depends on how you want to brand yourself. I’ve branded myself as “Gotch” and that’s what I’ve been called on sports team. I don’t link to Gotch SEO on my own site because it’s unnecessary. I would rather expand my presence on a different platform. However, when I comment on other blogs I always link back to Gotch SEO or my blog

      • Thanks for the reply.
        If I understand this correctly, because Google prefers to have around 50% of branded anchors it’s better to brand yourself Nathan Gotch than Nathan SEO, as Nathan Gotch would create a kind of a partial brand anchor, whereas Nathan SEO would be more of a partial Keyword anchor?

  107. Thanks for the reply.
    If I understand this correctly, because Google prefers to have around 50% of branded anchors it’s better to brand yourself Nathan Gotch than Nathan SEO, as Nathan Gotch would create a kind of a partial brand anchor, whereas Nathan SEO would be more of a partial Keyword anchor?

  108. Hi mr.gotch,I read your anchor text article thoroughly.It’s simply superb.And i have a crucial doubt regarding this article.It is :
    the exact match anchor text percentage that you are saying is, with regarding to whole site’s percentage or of that page?
    i analyzed something after this.for the keyword “anchor text” there is a tough competition going on.And i took this for a case study.I analyzed backlinks and their anchor texts using openlinkprofile tools.The sites moz,wordstream has very high percentages of Exact match anchor texts for that page and when compared to whole site’s anchor text profile that’s not at all considered.Here am talking about only that page’s link profile.
    moz and wordstream have 40-50% exact match anchor text whereas you , gotchseo has rarely 6% which is ethical and whitehat according to your article.But how can you outrank them?Plz help me out of this.Thanks in advance

    • Hi Sarah,

      Thanks for the comment! It’s on a page-by-page basis. Those sites are super authorities, so they can get away with over-optimization. In actuality, my exact match anchor text percentage for this article is less than 1%. The tools don’t always tell the full story.

  109. Can’t tell you how much I learned from your post :) I really thank you a lot Nathan! You have put in a lot of hard work for this post and it shows :)

  110. Hi Nathan, Great article!

    I’m not sure if this ever happens to your client’s sites, but in some instances, no matter how many times we diversify our anchors to be as safe as possible, Google plays their little trick where they temporarily drop half or on some occasions all the rankings.

    If you remove or change your anchors after the sudden rank drop, then you failed the test. I fell into that trap back in the days, but after reading their patents, it turns they do it on purpose to test the legitimacy of the links.

    • Hi Khaled,

      Yes, this is the Google dance. It can definitely freak you out / freak your client’s out. You’re totally right about them testing the legitimacy of your links.

  111. Hey Nathan,

    In section III of your article, you mention that “LSI, Partial Match Anchors” should be 1-5%. But in your excel file there are already 8 occurrences of Partial Match Anchors (green) within 30 links – that would come out to 25% if you were to continue at such a frequency!

    Did I miss something?

  112. Also, one more question along that line. How do you go about choosing your Partial Match Anchors – do you make them up by adding generic content “cool article about anchor text” or do you use them as an opportunity to target long tail keywords “bold anchor text”?

    Thanks!

  113. Hi Natan,
    Love this article. I read it once a weak cause its a lot to take.
    I have a question please..
    Does nofollow exact match count?
    and how should I treat disavowed exact match anchor text links?
    Thanks a lot!

    • Tommy,

      Thanks for the comment!

      Only a very small amount (if any) link equity flows through a NoFollowed link. HOWEVER, that doesn’t mean you should go out and spam them. Treat your anchor text the same regardless of whether it’s nofollow or not.

  114. Thanks for putting so much effort to produce complete post ! i mean it will take me another hour to completely read it =D

  115. Found this today. Excellent stuff.

  116. Hey Nathan,

    I have to say, I’ve been reading a lot of this stuff lately and this has got to be the best article I’ve come across by far. Gonna bookmark your site right now – keep up the great work!

  117. People tend to ignore naked anchors because they want a quick shortcut to rankings. Naked anchors are the best method to gaining a natural anchor profile. Great read, Nathan.

  118. Great article. I really understood what anchor text is and how to use it in diverse way to prevent little penguin’s sight on my site.

  119. Hi Nathan, Thanks for the detailed article on anchor text, will try to implement these.

  120. great write up by the way, one thing i came here to get the answer on but couldn’t find was what sort of ratio of links should go to your home page, key categories, products and articles pages.

    Say for example you had an “antique record store”, so that and variations of it was your main keywords your chasing, then you had categories like, vinyl, tapes, CD’s, country, rock. Follow by product pages like the beatles, Elvis, The who and so on, with the blog to match, the onsite help pages and articles the full whack!!!

    Still you want the majority of people to land on your home pages as thats the money, you’ll do a little niche linking for the better/choice products “elvis, bluesuade shoes original vinyl”

    but across the board you dont want to have every link to your home page, whats the break down?? is it reason able to have 50% of a sites links to its how page for example??

    • Hi Andy,

      Thanks for the comment! There is no perfect ratio of links to the homepage and to internal pages, but a general ratio is 50/50 split. You still want links going to the homepage so you can send link equity from the top down.

  121. Though long but Very nice article!!!

  122. Excellent article ! one question : 1 of my page seems to have been penalized but not the other pages, i think from over optimized anchors, 3 out of 5 keywords have dropped sharply, main keyword lost 40 spots from 20 to 60.What do you think it means when only some keywords are affected ?

  123. Hi there, great read !!
    If i got an inner page penalized from over optimized anchors which i was trying to rank for main keyword, can i re-focus on Home page to target main keyword ? maybe 301 the penalized one since hp has mainly branded and naked url anchors, that could even out the bad ratio !? what do you think ? Thanks very much and keep up the good writing, a pleasure to read !

    • Hi Fred,

      Thanks for the comment. Keep in the mind that anchor text distribution is judged on a page-by-page basis. You need to fix over-optimization issues before trying to optimize again

  124. Hey Nathan,

    keep providing unique and intelligent post for future of seo. There is no way to find out the best guide without your that will be penguin safe. I want to ask a question about keyword research. Please tell me how to make a good demo of keyword research for showing clients…if you share a full screenshot it will better for understand.

  125. Awesome write up. Took me a while to get through it all but definitely a conclusive article. Must have taken you a long time to test all these things especially the anchor text percentages.

  126. Definitely a great article on how to anchor-text,
    Thanks Nathan.

  127. Hi Nathan, Great article. I’ve built my website 2 years ago and have some good rankings but have done no link building at all. I’d like to give my site a bit of a push so will be following some of your advice in your excellent article. I have one question. When doing external linking do you always link back to the homepage when using the branded anchor text or can you put any url from your website in as the destination? I obviously have a main term that my whole website is going for and the home page is optimised for that term, but I have other pages with different terms I’m also looking to rank for. Do I link to those ones separately using brand or naked links? I’m a bit confused. Hope that makes sense.
    Cheers
    Neil.

    • Hi Neil,

      Thanks for the comment! Yes, you should link to each landing separately. Your anchor text percentages are calculated on a page-by-page basis

      • Hi Nathan, I still don’t understand!
        so lets say my site is http://www.chickenfarming.com, my keyword for home page is Chicken Farms. So I create a backlink with chickenfarming.com is the place to find chicken farms, that i understand. If I create another backlink for another page, say it’s called chicken egg colours with keyword of chicken eggs, what should my backlink look like? would it be http://www.chickenfarming.com is the place to find chicken eggs, with the underlying url going to the chicken eggs page for the anchor text http://www.chickenfarming.com or do I make the branded anchor text the same as the full destination URL.

        • Hi Neil,

          Thanks for the comment! I’m going to be totally honest with you – you’re overthinking it. I highly recommend you re-read the middle part of this article. It will help you a lot. If you’re still struggling please send me an email

  128. Hi. Here is a new research (10/2015) you might compare with Nathan’s recommendations: https://blog.ahrefs.com/anchor-text-analysis/

    Basically, it confirms what Nathan said, but might add a bit of information here and there. Take a look!

    — Rainer

  129. You’re welcome. I saw too late that you have posted there already – as the first one. Excellent. But I think that this case study supports your own research very well, so I posted it here. I always believe that as more we can get hands on to quality research from various parties, so better.

  130. Absolutely wonderful and truly exhaustive article – a piece of reference indeed!
    I am having a 10 years old site which was doing amazing, but of course, over the last year is started to rank worse… I am fearing that the backlinks are the culprit, so now I am analyzing one by one.
    What should we do with old free directories (not paid), which have “legal” back links (different anchors). But some of them are just abandoned or kept for AdSense?? The majority are not having more than PageRank of 2 on the homepage.
    This would be the question: to disavow it or now?
    We are applying meanwhile other techniques too, like dilution, etc.

    I would highly appreciate your help and advice!

    • Simona,

      Thanks for the comment! It depends on the anchor text you used for the directories. Directories are devalued and can be hurting your link profile in general (if you have a high percentage of them).

  131. Wow this is very thorough. I realize that I have some stuff to work on. Thanks for info.

  132. Hi Gotch,
    I really enjoyed the article. This is by far the best anchor text guide I’ve ever read on the internet. This has really increased my SEO knowledge 10 times and I really appreciate your time and effort writing it and also putting it in a way someone like me can understand. I will be using these strategies on my website to dilute my anchor profile using web 2.0’s since I’m kind of.. over-optimized.

    Once again, thank you and I also enjoyed reading your other article about Manual web 2.0 creation.

  133. Hi Nathan,

    Been following your many great article, you are such a genius person.
    After half way on my journey build tier 2 and try to apply your anchortext Percentages.
    Naked for 40%, did i using my money site naked keyword or my tier 1 naked keyword? im sorry for noob question, hope this never been discuss in past comment.

  134. Hi,

    This one was really an eye opener for a newbie like me. I even requested a resubmission of keywords for a $99 SEO package that I bought from a forum two days back. Added some generic and naked keyword. Thanks, man!

  135. Gees, good effort! Half way through and a real eye opener, bookmarked and coming back for the second half after lunch. :) Thanks for taking the time out to provide such great content free.

  136. Hello mr gotch
    Just wanna say thanks for this article, on my 1st reading this article, only 50% i can understand, i believe i need read 10 times again and practice to my site.
    Well that just i want to say, good luck and thanks again. :)

  137. Muhammad Talha says:

    Honestly, this is one of the best and comprehensive guides on freaking Earth about Anchor Text. The concepts of co-occurrence and co-citation were a little bit tricky but I got the hang of it. The best thing about this guide is that you showed a practical approach of keeping the things safe.

    I strongly agree that less percentage of exact match anchor will make it more powerful. Plus, it’s a common myth that article directories have become useless while they’re a great source of diversifying link profiles.

  138. Nathan, what an amazing article. It pretty much explains the best practices and tactics to be used to build backlinks without leaving a footprint. I myself as an SEO agency owner, always on the lookout for the best formula to build up our clients offpage factors without risking a penalty. I would like to add to this something I found to be very crucial which is the frequency with which you build backlinks and this is mainly connected to different factors as for example the domain age, the platforms and kind of websites that link to you etc My approach is always to look at what the competition is doing and try to use our experience and background to find the right link velocity, resources etc Again great job with this article :)

  139. Great Article, it’s my second time reading this particular article just to really understand. Quick question, what if i’m running a Clickbank review website and am trying to rank a POST lets say on. Example: “how to be a man” do you still recommend a branded anchor text or and exact match anchor text?

    kind regards,
    Richard

  140. Honestly, I loved it so much.. I were having big problem about anchor texts.. but now I can master it. thank you for your tired.

  141. That was great, i have succensfully SEO’d my own fencing company in perth, and back in the day it was number 1 for yrs, but as i got busy fencing and not really updateing my site and just going through the motion of building regular links from business directories, and a few good ones from similar businesses. i noticed my rank was dropping just slightly over the last few years, when my website is still very informative and much more informative than some of my competitors. even using CTLD mainly backlinks and was still loosing spots to people with less links and less information for that matter….
    However my fencing company is so versatile and i relise how non computer people use searches i ranks for something like 40 keywords still generating 1800 hits a month..
    Anyway thanks mate i have a fair understanding of SEO over the years of self teaching i even have 3 of my own clients on the side, taking away the information you’ve explained is going to help in so many ways.
    it was interesting and to me it made perfect sence, there is no way spam backlinks couldve ruled rankings, otherwise there is nothing else for SEO to do other than spam, but this is cool

  142. Really, nice guide for Anchor text. I think, Infographics are the best way to get Branded Link Building.. and I am going to start it, What do you think, will they really help me? ANy Suggestion?

  143. Nathan,

    This has gotch (see what I did there) to be the best site I’ve found on SEO tactics – and I’ve seen a lot.

    Congrats on a wonderful site.

  144. Thanks Nathan for such a comprehensive article. I have a question. One of my article has ranked well for certain keywords but after collecting all the keywords from Google Webmaster Tools. I found out that 3 of the keywords have the highest searches in Google, but none of my backlink has anchor text for that. I am planning to build some high quality backlinks for it. My question is, is it advisable to use the anchor text in an article from authority blogs. My link profile has several other and similar anchor text but the 3 particular anchor texts have no backlinks. Is it advisable to use them now?

    Once again thank you.

  145. Hey man

    thanks for the article. I have one question (BTW the social icons in the sidebar make commenting a bit difficult. But so many comments as you have prove that usability is not that important when people like something. They will come anyway)
    ok, question:
    you write:
    Partial Match Anchors: 1-5%
    Branded Anchor Text: 70%
    LSI, Partial Match Anchors: 1-5%

    How about branded partial match anchors? Let’s say keyword is = SEO St. Louis
    What percentage would be acceptable for “Gotch SEO St. Louis” as anchor?
    It is a branded anchor, so 70%? Or Partial Match Anchors: 1-5% ??

    • Hi Claude,

      Yes, my new site is in development now to fix issues like that!

      I would place branded partial match in the same category as general partial match anchors. So 1-5% if safe

  146. Too Much Anchor Text Mikey says:

    Awesome, very informative, and definitely very detailed write up about anchor text. I don’t think there any other article this detailed.

    Unfortunately, i should have read this two years ago but didn’t. My site is stuck on oage 2-5 due to over optimized exact match anchors like 40%. I should just buy another domain and start over but I think I have a chance since reading your article.

    I’n yhe last two weeks I’ve done a couple of things you suggested to dilute the anchors.

    Question:
    1. How fast can I dilute it? Let’s say I go to Fiverr and buy 2000 social bookmarks naked / branded anchors?

    2. How bad would it be if I dilute it all in one month…6000 naked / branded anchor links? What would happen?

    3. I have 50 pbn but only 20 are pointing to it now. It made gains to where it is now. Since i have 50 pbn, should I just disavow the exact match anchor link’s? It will be replace by another 30 good contextual branded linns anyways.

    Your thoughts please?

    • Hi friend,

      Thanks for the comment.

      Sorry to hear about your troubles!

      1. I don’t recommend hitting your site directly with Fiverr links. Although this may dilute your anchor text it will decrease the overall quality of your link profile.
      2. That’s pretty aggressive/unnecessary. If you have to go to those lengths, then you would likely be better off with a new domain
      3. It would be ideal to get the exact match anchors removed. Disavowing likely won’t help

      Sorry to be a downer :(

  147. Hi Nathan,

    First of all I would like to thank you for this awesome article about anchor text.

    My situation: We are webdesigners. And in the bottom of every website for a client we put there a link in threw our website. To let people know we made that website. And especially the anchor text ‘Webdesign bureau’ (it’s Dutch). That anchor is linking threw a landing page, named ‘Webdesign bureau’. But the percentage in Majestic of that landing page, shows a 33% with the anchor ‘Webdesign bureau’. So in our opinion that’s a way to much.
    Now we would like to change that anchor texts to put the 33% back down to 15%. What would you advise of how to do this? So for example to don’t bulk it? Etc.

    How would you do this? Thanks in advance.

    • Hi Thomas,

      Thanks for the comment!

      The only options you really have are to either unoptimize some of the anchors or add additional sitewide links on other client sites – this will dilute the anchor text. Either way, you need to increase the amount of branded anchor text in your profile.

  148. Awesome article! Very compelling guide I ever read!

    Question #1: Can I do the cycling on my web 2.0 posts? What I mean is that, I am planning to make 1 post per day following your cycling site#2. I have read the limitation 1~3 backlinks. Does this method will lift the limits?

    I want to apply this on my tier 1 to rank my money site that has AdSense and Affiliate.

    Question #2: This just comes to my mind after reading the whole article. Just a wild idea. What if I am going to buy a massive backlinking service using the cycling site#2 method with many variations like spinning, do you think is it gonna work?

    Thank you.

    • Jose,

      Thanks for the comment!

      Question #1: the 1-3 outbound link limitation on web 2.0s doesn’t change regardless of what anchor text you use. The anchor text cycling can be done with any link type

      Question #2: I don’t recommend any type of “massive” backlinking service

      • Thank you for the reply. Every web 2.0 outbound limitation is 1~3 and that means (as my last question), do I need to create another web 2.0 or a set of web 2.0 to produce another set of 1~3 backlinks and at least 1 pointing to the same the domain?

  149. Hi Nathan!
    I’m a big fan..(Read all your posts)
    One question please..

    So basically I am screwed if I have no-follow exact match and/or disavowed exact match which I can’t remove?

    • Hi Tommy,

      Thanks for the comment! No, you’re not screwed. It would just be ideal if you could get the bulk of those links removed. If you can’t, then use disavow. You will need to increase the percentage of quality backlinks in your profile to dilute the bad ones

Trackbacks

  1. […] you’re concerned about Penguin, here is a decent keyword anchor text guide which cites […]

  2. […] Know that the key to success in search engine optimization is in your ability to make it appear natural. Acquiring backlinks is one of its essential elements. But, it is sure to look odd if all the links you receive have your high-ranking keyword as their anchor texts. They are sure to look spammy for search engines. Make sure that you have a wide variety in keyword and brand links. […]

  3. […] too. If people are linking to a video on your website with anything other than medical anchor text (different types of anchor text) then you’ll notice a drop in your website […]

  4. […] unnatural to Google and may get you penalized. After finding your sources, reading something like The Epic Guide to Anchor text will give you a good understanding of what your anchor text portfolio should look […]

Speak Your Mind

*